Dear Convict, You make it so easy. You are lying
Post# of 7795
You make it so easy. You are lying even in the post where you say you are not lying. In your usual way you go the route of "who you gonna believe - me or your own lying eyes?"
You say Hunt denies these notes then you link to a post that shows Huffman's complaint where he also denies the loans. I know you will try to slice and dice it down so you can take them both out of context but you are just plain lying. Here is section 2 from your own link.
Quote:
2. Succinctly, the Defendant's theory and only defense that he has presented to his inane allegations of improper conduct, is that Seafarer grants to insiders a form of bottomless stock conversions, with no set price upon conversion of the monies lent to the Company. The documentary and true evidence will show that this baseless allegation will literally destroy the Defentant's only theory as to such stock conversions being essentially insider favoritism. Indeed the documents earlier offered for production subject to protection will show that the loans and conversions to related and other parties, except for some possible unrelated parties commercially, were at locked in pricing for conversion floors. The Defendant's inane, unsupported and false allegations will be shown be nothing more than baseless lies intended to further defame the Company, its principals and other related to such.
If this really was what you say it is, why are there so many remaining unconverted notes and purchase agreements that have still not been converted? Many to "related" parties? Do the related parties not understand how a pump and dump works? I think my last calculation was over 100,000,000 shares not converted by related parties dating back to 2012 or maybe even earlier. That doesn't even include others not in the related category. Why didn't they sell after these PRs that you say were touted to allow for "dumping" by these investors?
Is it Kyle's massive salary of zero dollars that allows him to take advantage of conversions?
Your arguments against this company and Kyle are simply wrong and you know it.
But don't worry, I'm hopeful it will all be explained to you very clearly in court.