He did mention it subtly. I am guessing he doesn't

He did mention it subtly. I am guessing he doesn't want to look like they are looking for every technicality to get the case thrown out. The whole case is based on lies and I belive Sullivan is confident enough that the case has no merit. He did point out several easy reasons for the case to be tossed rosen didn't attack that one. I belive the judge even commented on them only having one plantiff during oral presentation but didn't say much more.

If you try to defend yourself against lies of the board moderators your post will be deleted. Just like the board they claim to be better than!!! Watch who you trust especially the "long term investors" that support the real attackers!