I guess Mr. Hunt isn't too familiar with Florida s
Post# of 7802
Posted On: 03/30/2016 9:07:50 PM
I guess Mr. Hunt isn't too familiar with Florida statutes, and especially those concerning civil actions for libel. At least he doesn't appear to understand his next proper move. Nor do you seem to understand yours.....as a shareholder.
SFRX has the opportunity until 5 pm tomorrow to provide proof that the documents I have which were provided by Mary are not the application or permit issued. It is those documents that are the basis for my statements.
Under Florida law, SFRX will have to prove the statements I made were false and I intentionally posted them knowing they were false before they can collect any damages.
Further, SFRX's other attorney whose last name also starts with Hu like Hunt (Huffman) suggested I was harming the company last summer.
So why has Kyle waited so long to act? If I was harming the company last year, why have they not acted yet? To date they have simply threatened action.
But I am damaging the company? And it's in the MILLIONS of dollars? What are they waiting on?
I am required to file a correction under Florida law for any false statements I have made, but I need to see the "3 item" and 80/20 agreement in order to make such a correction. For some reason Kyle hasn't provided it, but he says I am damaging the company.
Further, Sinclair is required to report what you say he confirmed to the FBAR. I also need to see that documentation in order to correct the record.
At this point it's Kyle's move. But anyone could provide proof and I would apologize and make needed corrections. I have opened the floor up to anyone.
Simply saying it isn't true, or saying Sinclair said he confirmed what was filed with the Court isn't good enough.
Here's the basis of the four items I mentioned.
Application: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299332582/2014-05-...on-Area-A2
Permit: https://www.scribd.com/doc/298727048/2014-07-...t-EXECUTED
Please note: I will refer to Huffman as Hu1, and Hunt as Hu2 going forward. It will save storage space on computers.
But if you thought I was damaging the company, and you knew there was a "3 item" and/or an 80/20 agreement, where is it stated or implied in the permit that was issued?
And when did Sinclair report his "alleged" findings to the FBAR?
Quote:
I am also a shareholder of SFRX. I also believe you have harmed the company and you should be held accountable.
SFRX has the opportunity until 5 pm tomorrow to provide proof that the documents I have which were provided by Mary are not the application or permit issued. It is those documents that are the basis for my statements.
Under Florida law, SFRX will have to prove the statements I made were false and I intentionally posted them knowing they were false before they can collect any damages.
Further, SFRX's other attorney whose last name also starts with Hu like Hunt (Huffman) suggested I was harming the company last summer.
So why has Kyle waited so long to act? If I was harming the company last year, why have they not acted yet? To date they have simply threatened action.
But I am damaging the company? And it's in the MILLIONS of dollars? What are they waiting on?
I am required to file a correction under Florida law for any false statements I have made, but I need to see the "3 item" and 80/20 agreement in order to make such a correction. For some reason Kyle hasn't provided it, but he says I am damaging the company.
Further, Sinclair is required to report what you say he confirmed to the FBAR. I also need to see that documentation in order to correct the record.
At this point it's Kyle's move. But anyone could provide proof and I would apologize and make needed corrections. I have opened the floor up to anyone.
Simply saying it isn't true, or saying Sinclair said he confirmed what was filed with the Court isn't good enough.
Here's the basis of the four items I mentioned.
Application: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299332582/2014-05-...on-Area-A2
Permit: https://www.scribd.com/doc/298727048/2014-07-...t-EXECUTED
Please note: I will refer to Huffman as Hu1, and Hunt as Hu2 going forward. It will save storage space on computers.
But if you thought I was damaging the company, and you knew there was a "3 item" and/or an 80/20 agreement, where is it stated or implied in the permit that was issued?
And when did Sinclair report his "alleged" findings to the FBAR?
(1)
(0)