LOL!. You should try reading the 'comments' sectio

LOL!. You should try reading the 'comments' section on that site. even on winger sites there are some same 'sane' comments.

Seriously, if the polls showed Trump with a lead over Hillary do you really think there'd be any skepticism about the polls from the right?

You do remember the poll denial that the Romney campaign went through, right?

It takes courage to face reality. You're in for a rocky ride!

Quote:

---

Credible Hulk Mar 20, 2016 12:21 PM

Bwahahahahahaha!!! Sure Cryin' Chumpettree. And up is down, black is white, Adolph Hitler is Gandhi, and rocks fall up when you drop them.

What you're saying might make some sense if it was only one or a handful of polls showing Cankles murdalizing Chump. But no, it's virtually every poll, taken in a variety of different ways, of a number of different populations and sample sizes, that has been run since last July.

Not only that, but they all show Chump having the same level of support against Cankles, around 40%. That includes the poll being hammered by Justa Chumpcombette over in the "Tipsheeit" section, which shows Chump polling at 30% against both Cankles and Dr. Emmett Sanders in New York. Chump's RCP poll average against Cankles is 41%

To make matters even more convincing, Chump's actual vote tally in the primaries, which would be heavily skewed toward Republicans, is also in that range, 37.04%.

Few times in recent memory have so many data points agreed, as the number that agree that Chump couldn't beat Cankles if he shot her on 5th Avenue.

Sorry, Cryin' Chumpettree. Even if what you say was right, Chump is the magic Cankles has been looking for to turn around her lackluster support. If Chump does add 10 million voters to the Republican rolls, and that is very doubtful, he'll add 20 million voters to Cankles who would have stayed home if it was anyone else.

Chump is the only candidate who makes Cankles look good by comparison.

---