$TPAC You know, I am not sure as to the nature of
Post# of 22940
Posted On: 03/22/2016 7:55:45 PM
Re: smartmoney #5503
$TPAC You know, I am not sure as to the nature of the relationship, Smart. I went on their website(thanks for the links Texas!) and it would not surprise me if we end up making parts or collaborating in some fashion. They do not appear to be NAVAIR certified, nor do they appear to be competition in the form of a fellow bearing supplier/manufacturer. I am wondering if they can deliver a more comprehensive version of their product if the bearings that are potentially required come with the aircraft section they are manufacturing.
I do not know Paul's part in all of this, most specifically what the benefit is for himself or for Avcorp, but Paul has held many significant positions with Boeing, and has had numerous years of experience working with the company. Avcorp, as no surprise, also serves Boeing. And while Avcorp does not have NAVAIR(or at least so it seems upon cursory glance), it does have AS9100C, which leads me to believe that, if nothing else, Paul is serving a consultant or advisory position for TPAC, and due to his aforementioned experience with Boeing, word could have been passed along that AS9100C is the way to go for expedited approval. And his presence at the meeting, could serve as quite the segue, considering he is likely a familiar face to both parties. He may be the bridge between us and Boeing, just as we seem to be the bridge between Boeing and AVIC.
I am also very much looking forward to the updates from today's meeting(s). While I expect the overall process to take a bit of time(as in a few months), I think this is a very significant step in the right direction, and one that will eventually secure Boeing as a client.
I do not know Paul's part in all of this, most specifically what the benefit is for himself or for Avcorp, but Paul has held many significant positions with Boeing, and has had numerous years of experience working with the company. Avcorp, as no surprise, also serves Boeing. And while Avcorp does not have NAVAIR(or at least so it seems upon cursory glance), it does have AS9100C, which leads me to believe that, if nothing else, Paul is serving a consultant or advisory position for TPAC, and due to his aforementioned experience with Boeing, word could have been passed along that AS9100C is the way to go for expedited approval. And his presence at the meeting, could serve as quite the segue, considering he is likely a familiar face to both parties. He may be the bridge between us and Boeing, just as we seem to be the bridge between Boeing and AVIC.
I am also very much looking forward to the updates from today's meeting(s). While I expect the overall process to take a bit of time(as in a few months), I think this is a very significant step in the right direction, and one that will eventually secure Boeing as a client.
(3)
(0)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Do your own DD. Assume everyone here is either an amateur trader/investor or a paid interest such as a compensated pumper/basher. My posts are strictly for entertainment purposes. I am not on Wall St., do not work for a group, and only get paid when my personal investments materialize. I am only responsible for my own gains and losses; no one is to blame for my mistakes or for any advice taken from postings; likewise, I am not to blame for any advice you take of mine, regardless of gains or losses from doing so. Good luck to all; may you live long and prosper greatly.