Just trying to show you that us "heads" still have

Just trying to show you that us "heads" still have a few bridges spanning our synaptic gaps. My argument for the investment now has a wealth of validating progress to back it, but I like to put into perspective the reference to numbers as a primary guide to deciding whether or not to invest as follows:
Trying to establish the sensibility of the investment in a start up still on the pink sheets using fins report numbers really only makes sense after progress is reexamined (post start up debt and dilution reduction and/or elimination), providing sales are increasing at a robust pace so that it's reasonable to expect revenues from sales to overtake cost of operation in the near term. As far as I can see, Rocky Mountain High Brands is moving exactly in that direction, so the numbers as they exist presently don't truly represent the upside potential. When speculating on a start up stock on the pink sheets, what else is there to bring an investor to loading up but forward looking speculation on the upside potential??? You either see the potential and are willing to gamble on it, or you don't and/or you're not. Numbers can't yet be relied upon to accurately predict where the company will be a year or more out, sometimes even months out. I still believe strongly that 2016 will provide all of the verification we could ever need that this is a long term gold mine. No harm intended. High five to you as well! You're on the right ship. Sandy beaches dead ahead! lol