Double Barrell Darrell did harm to the scheme, not
Post# of 7802
Posted On: 03/05/2016 2:34:21 PM
Re: Coat Tail Rider #1775
Double Barrell Darrell did harm to the scheme, not SFRX. That harm is done by Kyle and his merry band of toxic lenders that simply wanted him to shut up.
The case will backfire, in my opinion. It was an abuse of process. I am glad Judge Cook considered her ruling and wasn't just a rubber stamp. When a Pro Se Defendant that "skims through" and signs a document that would create a liability of over $10MM deserves a hearing. That's why Judge Cook REJECTED the settlement. Her conscience prevented Her from being a rubber stamp. SFRX has to prove his postings did the company harm.
If shareholders lost money THEY have to sue in an attempt to recover their losses. I personally think they should. Kyle and lenders have KILLED the stock. It's in the filings.
Again, Buc did damage to the pump and dump scheme, but not the company. Any shareholder that sold when he spoke out about what the FBAR told him should personally thank him for pointing out the truth.
There was no 80/20 agreement.
There was no right to a salvage permit if 3 items were obtained.
The company HYPED the ever loving crap out of a dig and identify permit they still haven't gotten environmental permits for.
Please notice the great DETAIL in which I argue my points. Kyle should hire some better minions to do his bidding. Of course it's hard to defend a fraud, huh?
Have a nice weekend. And join my effort to get SFRX to update the investing community on the permit application(s). They can also address why they were using blowers when the permit PROHIBITS it. The written word is a powerful thing, right?
Buc's written word scared them to death.
The case will backfire, in my opinion. It was an abuse of process. I am glad Judge Cook considered her ruling and wasn't just a rubber stamp. When a Pro Se Defendant that "skims through" and signs a document that would create a liability of over $10MM deserves a hearing. That's why Judge Cook REJECTED the settlement. Her conscience prevented Her from being a rubber stamp. SFRX has to prove his postings did the company harm.
If shareholders lost money THEY have to sue in an attempt to recover their losses. I personally think they should. Kyle and lenders have KILLED the stock. It's in the filings.
Again, Buc did damage to the pump and dump scheme, but not the company. Any shareholder that sold when he spoke out about what the FBAR told him should personally thank him for pointing out the truth.
There was no 80/20 agreement.
There was no right to a salvage permit if 3 items were obtained.
The company HYPED the ever loving crap out of a dig and identify permit they still haven't gotten environmental permits for.
Please notice the great DETAIL in which I argue my points. Kyle should hire some better minions to do his bidding. Of course it's hard to defend a fraud, huh?
Have a nice weekend. And join my effort to get SFRX to update the investing community on the permit application(s). They can also address why they were using blowers when the permit PROHIBITS it. The written word is a powerful thing, right?
Buc's written word scared them to death.
(1)
(2)