Maybe I am way off (out to lunch) but this deal co
Post# of 8802
The question that has being troubling me for sometime now is who is in on the deal with TALK and UMS?
It mentions affiliates 17 times in agreement.
6.2 No Conflicts. Neither the execution nor delivery of this Agreement by Talk nor the fulfillment of Talk’s obligations under this Agreement, will (a) conflict with or result in Talk’s material violation of or default under Talk’s Organizational Documents or any material mortgage, indenture, loan agreement, lease, permit, concession, franchise agreement or license agreement to which Talk is a party, (b) result in a material violation of any Law or Order applicable to Talk, (c) require Talk or its Affiliates to obtain the consent, approval, authorization or Order of, or to make any filing, registration or qualification with, any Governmental Entity or (d) result in the creation of any Lien upon the assets of Talk or its Affiliates which would reasonably be expected to impair or delay Talk’s ability to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.