cajun - i agree and disagree. if one engages them
Post# of 22940
Posted On: 02/24/2016 1:12:37 PM
cajun - i agree and disagree. if one engages them on that board - you are correct. however, as others have said - the two are intricately intertwined since that is the preeminent board for traders and thus where new investors are generally directed.
the key is not to dwell but address the issue, the lies, etc - and then not let the same post/lie be continued to dominate the discussion. for any stock price to appreciate - demand has to outstrip supply. current investors only can buy so much before it no longer makes sense to buy more (from a cost basis, portfolio %, risk tolerance, etc). at that point - how does the price appreciate...? for any company to continue to prosper - new investors need to continue to come in and the risk needs to continually be spread from current to new. that brings down volatility, increases share price, and makes the company much stronger going forward.
as i said in prior posts - investors should focus on directing attention of new investors to this board through various SM platforms to raise the awareness of this forum AND at the same time, help it increase its visibility on search engines so that it shows up when one is beginning to do DD. however, to completely ignore that board or its negative effect can be at current shareholders own despair. new investors can be turned off before they ever delve deeper into the DD.
i think it is important for the moderators here to sticky key messages with pros and cons and continue to redirect all new/potential investors back to the 6/15 CC by Bill, the business plan/strategy on the website, and the timeline of completions over the last 12-18 months. that is a solid start for any new investor in conjunction with understanding the share price decline during the CD phase, the share buyback and surrounding issues, and how the current waiting period hinges on acquisition/funding to increase size and scope of $TPAC to provide better visibility and clearer path for large mfg procurement.
Posted On: 02/24/2016 1:00:45 PM
Avatar
Posted By: CajunPhil
Re: tradingjeff #4035
I totally disagree, you fallen into their BS.
ALL of you just hurt TPAC by keeping spreading the I HUB garbage day in and day out. This has become ridiculous.
the key is not to dwell but address the issue, the lies, etc - and then not let the same post/lie be continued to dominate the discussion. for any stock price to appreciate - demand has to outstrip supply. current investors only can buy so much before it no longer makes sense to buy more (from a cost basis, portfolio %, risk tolerance, etc). at that point - how does the price appreciate...? for any company to continue to prosper - new investors need to continue to come in and the risk needs to continually be spread from current to new. that brings down volatility, increases share price, and makes the company much stronger going forward.
as i said in prior posts - investors should focus on directing attention of new investors to this board through various SM platforms to raise the awareness of this forum AND at the same time, help it increase its visibility on search engines so that it shows up when one is beginning to do DD. however, to completely ignore that board or its negative effect can be at current shareholders own despair. new investors can be turned off before they ever delve deeper into the DD.
i think it is important for the moderators here to sticky key messages with pros and cons and continue to redirect all new/potential investors back to the 6/15 CC by Bill, the business plan/strategy on the website, and the timeline of completions over the last 12-18 months. that is a solid start for any new investor in conjunction with understanding the share price decline during the CD phase, the share buyback and surrounding issues, and how the current waiting period hinges on acquisition/funding to increase size and scope of $TPAC to provide better visibility and clearer path for large mfg procurement.
Posted On: 02/24/2016 1:00:45 PM
Avatar
Posted By: CajunPhil
Re: tradingjeff #4035
I totally disagree, you fallen into their BS.
ALL of you just hurt TPAC by keeping spreading the I HUB garbage day in and day out. This has become ridiculous.
(1)
(1)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼