Both of my posts today were intentional, personal,

Both of my posts today were intentional, personal, attacks so they actually qualified to be deleted.

I want to see both the positive and the negative comments. However, when you have five moderators and all five post nothing but negative, even an new person like me can see that there is nothing worth reading on that board. Since the moderators themselves are posting off-topic, it stands to reason that they will allow off-topic posts that agree with their assessment.

Example of off topic: "TPAC is junk stock." <--this would be off topic because it is a personal attack with no backing.

However, "TPAC is junk stock because ...." would not be off-topic if the post made a good case for the opinion.

In the same way: "TPAC is the greatest stock ever." is also off topic unless it is followed with, ... because... and a rational explanation for their opinion.

This is why I wish I hadn't wasted a whole three days on ihub, an absolutely worthless thread in regards to TPAC because all of the assigned moderators are negative posters (there are no off-setting positive posting moderators) and these moderators either negatively respond to positive comments or delete them outright.

(See what I did there with relating my opinion to the topic and justifying my opinion?)

I'm only responsible for what I say, not for what you understand.