New filing is interesting.. Dtcc already provided information to COR..... so its likely COR already knows very well what transpired.
" In responding to E-Trade’s arguments, COR Clearing wishes... to cite information derived documents designated as “confidential” and “highly confidential” in the underlying litigation. More specifically, the information COR Clearing now seeks to seal was produced by (or derived from documents produced by) the Depository Trust Clearing Corporation (“DTCC”) pursuant to a subpoena COR Clearing issued to the DTCC in connection with the underlying litigation. The DTCC designated the pertinent documents and information as “confidential” or “highly confidential,” pursuant to a Protective Order entered by the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska in the underlying litigation. "
“Highly Confidential” Designation. A Party may designate as “Highly
Confidential” any Material as to any Receiving Party where the Producing Party reasonably and in good faith believes that the Receiving Party engaged in fraudulent activity which caused harm to the Party and that producing the Material to such Receiving Party could cause harm to the
Producing Party.
ALL IMHO
" In responding to E-Trade’s arguments, COR Clearing wishes... to cite information derived documents designated as “confidential” and “highly confidential” in the underlying litigation. More specifically, the information COR Clearing now seeks to seal was produced by (or derived from documents produced by) the Depository Trust Clearing Corporation (“DTCC”) pursuant to a subpoena COR Clearing issued to the DTCC in connection with the underlying litigation. The DTCC designated the pertinent documents and information as “confidential” or “highly confidential,” pursuant to a Protective Order entered by the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska in the underlying litigation. "
“Highly Confidential” Designation. A Party may designate as “Highly
Confidential” any Material as to any Receiving Party where the Producing Party reasonably and in good faith believes that the Receiving Party engaged in fraudulent activity which caused harm to the Party and that producing the Material to such Receiving Party could cause harm to the
Producing Party.
ALL IMHO
5
Calissio Resources Group, Inc. (CRGP) Stock Research Links
PLEASE READ IF YOU READ MY POSTS
I invested in Calissio Resources Group because I considered the financial statements warranted an investment. For every reader here that has been paying attention to my posts, please note the following:
1) I am not licensed to give investment advice. Everything expressed here is an opinion of my own for discussion purposes.
2) The only thing I know about the upcoming merger is that typically they are good for investors. A premium is typically offered when companies go private from what I understand. I certainly was and still am an investor before this announcement was made.
3) Finally, regarding the current OS, while there is lots of conjecture, I must rely on the only available information out there which has been presented in PRs. Therefore, OS as of the last PR was 242m. Consequently, I don't believe there is reason to believe I am a majority holder, despite recent purchases, without making a large degree of assumptions.
If anyone is wondering why I am posting this, it is because I want to make sure no one misinterprets my posts or considers I have any intent on the board other than to share potential ideas/speculate on possibilities.
I invested in Calissio Resources Group because I considered the financial statements warranted an investment. For every reader here that has been paying attention to my posts, please note the following:
1) I am not licensed to give investment advice. Everything expressed here is an opinion of my own for discussion purposes.
2) The only thing I know about the upcoming merger is that typically they are good for investors. A premium is typically offered when companies go private from what I understand. I certainly was and still am an investor before this announcement was made.
3) Finally, regarding the current OS, while there is lots of conjecture, I must rely on the only available information out there which has been presented in PRs. Therefore, OS as of the last PR was 242m. Consequently, I don't believe there is reason to believe I am a majority holder, despite recent purchases, without making a large degree of assumptions.
If anyone is wondering why I am posting this, it is because I want to make sure no one misinterprets my posts or considers I have any intent on the board other than to share potential ideas/speculate on possibilities.
