I still have my faith complete in GTRQ. There st
Post# of 1559
Posted On: 02/20/2016 2:53:04 PM
I still have my faith complete in GTRQ.
There still are some strong points around to support for it.
For example the strength from Longers has been all the way one of the solid support for all this time. We also has to see Gregg's will in keeping share structure as the other solid support. In Resumen those are the only solid supports we have: Long Holders and Gregg.
About weakness I would say one: Certification it is in red flashing. Also the relationships in between ITRAQ and GEOTRAQ has been weaking rather than strength "Perception" of the project. I have to point Gregg as guilty. Gregg has been keeping all the way in silent, we appreciate some emails as answers but: we know that is not enough. Roman from ITRAQ is in comunication with the market and because of the lack of communication from Gregg we end in trying to read GEOTRAQ from ITRAQ. And that is not the proper way, we are making speculations on speculations. That do not give STRENGTH but WEAKNESS.
GEOTRAQ had to keep informed (shareholders, market) step by step every situation. Here is where that USA "No News is Good News" do not apply for investments, maybe if from a Corp Marine in Siria or past in Vietnam.
We should have seen CERTIFICATION all the way as a FORMALITY to achieve, ... so GEOTRAQ can ensure to big companies this invention it works perfect beyond any reasonable doubts.
But we see CERTIFICATION as "To Live or let Die". An invention and project with problems, delays. And we do not know the deep of those problems. Maybe they are not so deep. Maybe they are part of a natural process, but by the other hand the AGENDA is not made by us, but by Gregg, and it is clear the AGENDA is delayed.
The strength from long shareholders and share structure, by the way, are the only to supports we have to say: Things are not the bad we can also reasonable imagine
There still are some strong points around to support for it.
For example the strength from Longers has been all the way one of the solid support for all this time. We also has to see Gregg's will in keeping share structure as the other solid support. In Resumen those are the only solid supports we have: Long Holders and Gregg.
About weakness I would say one: Certification it is in red flashing. Also the relationships in between ITRAQ and GEOTRAQ has been weaking rather than strength "Perception" of the project. I have to point Gregg as guilty. Gregg has been keeping all the way in silent, we appreciate some emails as answers but: we know that is not enough. Roman from ITRAQ is in comunication with the market and because of the lack of communication from Gregg we end in trying to read GEOTRAQ from ITRAQ. And that is not the proper way, we are making speculations on speculations. That do not give STRENGTH but WEAKNESS.
GEOTRAQ had to keep informed (shareholders, market) step by step every situation. Here is where that USA "No News is Good News" do not apply for investments, maybe if from a Corp Marine in Siria or past in Vietnam.
We should have seen CERTIFICATION all the way as a FORMALITY to achieve, ... so GEOTRAQ can ensure to big companies this invention it works perfect beyond any reasonable doubts.
But we see CERTIFICATION as "To Live or let Die". An invention and project with problems, delays. And we do not know the deep of those problems. Maybe they are not so deep. Maybe they are part of a natural process, but by the other hand the AGENDA is not made by us, but by Gregg, and it is clear the AGENDA is delayed.
The strength from long shareholders and share structure, by the way, are the only to supports we have to say: Things are not the bad we can also reasonable imagine
(1)
(1)