20160216|PTOI|16000|0|27643|O 57.88% (58%) t
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 02/16/2016 6:48:58 PM
20160216|PTOI|16000|0|27643|O 57.88% (58%)
this analysis is revealing due to P2O/PTOI's enviable SS entering 2016
this analysis is revealing due to P2O's (company) evolution of their disruptive technology and *SURVIVING*
this analysis includes MM Monthly ~ which wasn't even *allowed* at *inception* ..
..
and which Finra kindly imitated re: MM % breakdowns (something I'd done *publicly* since 2010)
this analysis encompasses ATS Dark Pool ~ which didn't become a *reality* re: reporting till mid 2014
this analysis reveals wash traded volume and how that *volume* comps to prior years' volume *totals* ..
(that would be back to back 36M/36M annual volume totals)
this analysis reveals *patterns* clearly in *play* for anyone with actual interest in the documentation
whether it's *monthly volume/duped or hidden trades/or reg sho %s noted over weeks/months/years* ..
that 99% stat trotted out by rote is *recognizable* for a reason .. that said:
i can certainly understand why showing 2010's *volume* in comparison to 2015's *volume* (20M/22M)
with an approximate $ difference of $37Million could prove difficult to address .. CONsidering most
targeted OTC co.s/stox would be *trading* 500,000 on avg @ a 02 - 03 *pps* >> range
i can certainly understand why showing the *breakdown* of MM decoys' %s *actually reported to Finra*
vs what said decoys' *show* via RT l2 (real time level 2) .. would be problematic for those who illegally
manipulate OTC stox like PTOI by rote
i recognize why *knowing* when handoffs' occur .. not only re: NN (Primary) but the changeout specific
to Secondary in *alignment* with other CONtemporaneous *facts* is a problem
i can certainly understand why showing most of PTOI's daily tape of trades >> highlighting clearly visible
duplicated wash trading at the same pps or a hidden pps would be an issue *preferably that remained hidden*
and i can truly .. .. understand why revealing *intraday signals* by the usual suspects .. on a *targeted*
but >> surviving OTC company's stock (regardless of where the pps has been manipulated to) presents
a dilemma for those who *do by rote* .. because it is a skill set that is easily *transferrable* to other
*targeted* OTC co.s/stox (investors/mgmt/Finra)
and let's face it .. is there any OTC company/stock that hasn't been targeted by CEs? .. rhetorical
as for today .. spot the obvious
PTOI >> 2.16.16
$0.0252 2,000 OTO 15:59:11
$0.0247 2,000 OTO 15:59:11
$0.0252 1,000 OTO 15:59:09
$0.0247 1,000 OTO 15:59:09
$0.0251 2,000 OTO 15:59:09
$0.0231 7,143 OTO 12:19:43 .. @ CDEL's jumped bid .. relo/s bid to 023
$0.023 1,800 OTO 09:31:07 .. @ bid
$0.023 700 OTO 09:31:07 ** long's partial @ bid
$0.0231 10,000 OTO 09:31:06 .. @ ARCA's jumped bid (ATS Dark Pool? a decoy? or both)
4kids
this analysis is revealing due to P2O/PTOI's enviable SS entering 2016
this analysis is revealing due to P2O's (company) evolution of their disruptive technology and *SURVIVING*
this analysis includes MM Monthly ~ which wasn't even *allowed* at *inception* ..
.. and which Finra kindly imitated re: MM % breakdowns (something I'd done *publicly* since 2010)
this analysis encompasses ATS Dark Pool ~ which didn't become a *reality* re: reporting till mid 2014
this analysis reveals wash traded volume and how that *volume* comps to prior years' volume *totals* ..
(that would be back to back 36M/36M annual volume totals)
this analysis reveals *patterns* clearly in *play* for anyone with actual interest in the documentation
whether it's *monthly volume/duped or hidden trades/or reg sho %s noted over weeks/months/years* ..
that 99% stat trotted out by rote is *recognizable* for a reason .. that said:
i can certainly understand why showing 2010's *volume* in comparison to 2015's *volume* (20M/22M)
with an approximate $ difference of $37Million could prove difficult to address .. CONsidering most
targeted OTC co.s/stox would be *trading* 500,000 on avg @ a 02 - 03 *pps* >> range
i can certainly understand why showing the *breakdown* of MM decoys' %s *actually reported to Finra*
vs what said decoys' *show* via RT l2 (real time level 2) .. would be problematic for those who illegally
manipulate OTC stox like PTOI by rote
i recognize why *knowing* when handoffs' occur .. not only re: NN (Primary) but the changeout specific
to Secondary in *alignment* with other CONtemporaneous *facts* is a problem
i can certainly understand why showing most of PTOI's daily tape of trades >> highlighting clearly visible
duplicated wash trading at the same pps or a hidden pps would be an issue *preferably that remained hidden*
and i can truly ..
.. understand why revealing *intraday signals* by the usual suspects .. on a *targeted* but >> surviving OTC company's stock (regardless of where the pps has been manipulated to) presents
a dilemma for those who *do by rote* .. because it is a skill set that is easily *transferrable* to other
*targeted* OTC co.s/stox (investors/mgmt/Finra)
and let's face it .. is there any OTC company/stock that hasn't been targeted by CEs? .. rhetorical
as for today .. spot the obvious
PTOI >> 2.16.16
$0.0252 2,000 OTO 15:59:11
$0.0247 2,000 OTO 15:59:11
$0.0252 1,000 OTO 15:59:09
$0.0247 1,000 OTO 15:59:09
$0.0251 2,000 OTO 15:59:09
$0.0231 7,143 OTO 12:19:43 .. @ CDEL's jumped bid .. relo/s bid to 023
$0.023 1,800 OTO 09:31:07 .. @ bid
$0.023 700 OTO 09:31:07 ** long's partial @ bid
$0.0231 10,000 OTO 09:31:06 .. @ ARCA's jumped bid (ATS Dark Pool? a decoy? or both)
4kids
(6)
(0)