What more can he tell us? Uh, How many miles on
Post# of 3605
Posted On: 02/12/2016 1:40:52 PM
What more can he tell us?
Uh, How many miles on the Mercedes when the conversion was first made. How many miles did the test require?
How many miles were put on the car between the first test and each test since.
A copy of the last test results.
Without this data, the PR means nothing.
The Mercedes could have been setting in a garage for the past ten years for all we know. (How else can you explain "no oil change in ten years"?
Have any of you ever driven an automobile for 10 years without changing the oil? Do you know of anyone who has?
If his valve system prevents degradation of oil in an internal combustion engine for 10 years that would be an amazing accomplishment in it's self.
No one here has even commented on that.
Even the improvement in efficiency can be read either way.
In a court of law it says and proves nothing.
Small details count.
Leaving them out speaks volumes about the accuracy of what is being said.
George has not earned the benefit of a doubt. Quite the contrary.
How hard can it be to write a PR that actually tells you something.
I could go on for a while but I wish folks would actually read what the PR says rather than what you hope it insinuates.
I'm looking hard for something to believe in.
Help me out.
Ernie
Uh, How many miles on the Mercedes when the conversion was first made. How many miles did the test require?
How many miles were put on the car between the first test and each test since.
A copy of the last test results.
Without this data, the PR means nothing.
The Mercedes could have been setting in a garage for the past ten years for all we know. (How else can you explain "no oil change in ten years"?
Have any of you ever driven an automobile for 10 years without changing the oil? Do you know of anyone who has?
If his valve system prevents degradation of oil in an internal combustion engine for 10 years that would be an amazing accomplishment in it's self.
No one here has even commented on that.
Even the improvement in efficiency can be read either way.
In a court of law it says and proves nothing.
Small details count.
Leaving them out speaks volumes about the accuracy of what is being said.
George has not earned the benefit of a doubt. Quite the contrary.
How hard can it be to write a PR that actually tells you something.
I could go on for a while but I wish folks would actually read what the PR says rather than what you hope it insinuates.
I'm looking hard for something to believe in.
Help me out.
Ernie
(0)
(0)