Absolutely agree. I'm here on this board (and was actually a charter member of IHang) because it allows for thoughtful discussion of the issues...not because it is a Pollyanna alternative to iHub. I like that outright paid bashers are not allowed in here, but I want to support thoughtful discussion -- even if it may have negative connotations. This should not be a "pump" board, but a place for investors/traders to investigate, discuss, maybe vent occasionally (as I do), and unlock some good, verifiable DD. If this ever turns out to only be a "pump" alternative to the iHub TPAC board, then I'll be gone. I went through that with FITX over a year ago. By the way, that (FITX) CEO was very communicative and transparent early on as well, had a building and a plan, and that did not turn out well for most investors. I'm not painting our present CEO with the same brushstroke, but please understand I have every reason to be cautious, curious, and skeptical after having lived through FITX, IJJP, PVSP, and ANAS pump and dumps. Best of luck to us all.
(0)
(0)
Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links