Thanks Btownz for your lines. The only point I I h
Post# of 1559
I am not saying that is the way to do it, and can't be other way. Managment is free to decide wich is the way and maybe your thoughts are in the right direction. But wether yours or mine, I think there is a loose end about this issue and instead of giving strength to perceptions, give certain weakness.
As we have very few information in hands, seems all we can is to review dozens of times what we have. For example about that TV show presentation Greeg&Norman to say the true all was as same Gregg said "Outstanding". Until the presentator closed the program with "We have problems with certification, and if that fails we are all crashed" (words more or lees). When camera was pointing face of Gregg he seems tooked by surprise and said nothing. Not in the TV show and not after the TV show. He could make any short communication saying something like "I as CEO and inventor have to say to shareholders that Certification the question is not if it shall come, but when. As I can assure all this will be certificated as outstanding". Why he did not say a word ?
I readed Dread Robert Pirate in "liehub" and he is a good reference for all of us. He agree inventors are not mostly good managers. Many months ago I wrote that in the direction to reinforce this is a project more to be sold than to be managed by Gregg. And I am talking about a good adquisition or buyout plan. I can see a Gregg happier with a full of Millions US$ in his banck accounts enjoing life better than at his 50's face the huge challenge to leader GETORAQ to be the new standard as could be an INTEL but for geopositioning.
When we see other examples:
Jobs from Apple
Mark From Facebook
Google, etc
All these billion US$ cases were very young guys that had a full life ahead to try. Gregg has half life ahead. I can smell from him a very careful man ablout money, and what to say or when. I don't smell from Gregg a man that wants to rule the world as was easy to smell from Jobs or Mike.
Adquisition, Buyout is other issue in wich I was thinking many times. It is a frequently "Chance" sold in many ticker boards and not only OTC. We also now that happens not a few times every year. But also we know that is hard to happen with shares in hand, and also that does not mean the "Great" it was spected to be as normally this comes with am ugly change in share structure. So I decide not to hang in that "Chance" with strong beleive, but I can't denie the chance is there for good or not so good.
Gregg has a few good points. I smell in him an honest man. And I fell in him someone that is worry about his shareholders project. This do not mean a succesfull man, ... if we can have a succesfull man from him plus the honest one we have. We are in the right place.
To me $GTRQ represents today 50/50 Risk/Opp
That is a huge risk for anyone to buy now
And that is an unfear risk for longers
But almost every risk has the side of opportunity
There is a chance for longers to buy a little more at these prices.
If you want to say something, I will thanks.
For sure the rest of us
Millonario