My amateur take on this is that whoever it is that
Post# of 22940
Posted On: 02/05/2016 6:44:08 PM
My amateur take on this is that whoever it is that pays the TPAC bashers is pretty low on shares. We've seen them keep this stock priced where they wanted it in order to accumulate and short the stock pretty much up until Bill bought 500 million out from under them. I think they lost a good amount of their control at that time and then the price went up so fast they could no longer afford to keep 100s of millions of shares on hand in order to dump into the bid and spook retail investors.
I also think in December, the flipped over almost pure pump mode in order to drive up the price and then short.
No the stock is priced on their edge of their range, and I think that most of these particular slime balls go away a .015 and up. Then we'll get a much higher class of slime balls all the way around
a year from now, any of us that still own TPAC will look back on this when the same amusement I have when thinking of Sister Diane from elementary school back at St. Francis
I also think in December, the flipped over almost pure pump mode in order to drive up the price and then short.
No the stock is priced on their edge of their range, and I think that most of these particular slime balls go away a .015 and up. Then we'll get a much higher class of slime balls all the way around
a year from now, any of us that still own TPAC will look back on this when the same amusement I have when thinking of Sister Diane from elementary school back at St. Francis
(0)
(0)