"You're missing the point. The 'vicissitudes' brea
Post# of 65629
Posted On: 02/05/2016 1:43:32 AM
"You're missing the point. The 'vicissitudes' break in favor of Dem Administrations for the 53 year period covered."
Break in favor of Democrat Administrations in regards to what? The overall market? That means nothing to me. Irrational behavior is not a market metric I concern myself with. It only serves me in order to provide me with possible opportunities.
"And the article did not JUST address stock market returns but also job creation numbers too."
Which article are you referring to?
"That you don't agree with association, much less causation, doesn't
conflict with my claim that Republicans' claim that they are better for the metrics discussed and Dems are sh*t, and that Republicans would use the numbers if they were in their favor."
I was under the assumption that you asked me, personally, that question, and I have answered it. I also stated two points that I'll reiterate here again that, 1. I abhor both political parties equally and, 2. I can only argue my own personal convictions and have no desire to argue for someone else.
Break in favor of Democrat Administrations in regards to what? The overall market? That means nothing to me. Irrational behavior is not a market metric I concern myself with. It only serves me in order to provide me with possible opportunities.
"And the article did not JUST address stock market returns but also job creation numbers too."
Which article are you referring to?
"That you don't agree with association, much less causation, doesn't
conflict with my claim that Republicans' claim that they are better for the metrics discussed and Dems are sh*t, and that Republicans would use the numbers if they were in their favor."
I was under the assumption that you asked me, personally, that question, and I have answered it. I also stated two points that I'll reiterate here again that, 1. I abhor both political parties equally and, 2. I can only argue my own personal convictions and have no desire to argue for someone else.
(0)
(0)
"The more numerous any assembly may be, of whatever characters composed, the greater is known to be the ascendancy of passion over reason." - Federalist no. 58