I hope you're right, but... Let's look at the Jud
Post# of 72440
Posted On: 02/03/2016 1:13:09 AM
I hope you're right, but...
Let's look at the Judge's actions so far.
1) Rosen ask for permission to file a second amended complaint and Sullivan opposes it. Result - Rosen gets exactly what they asked for.
2) Rosen ask for additional days to file said second amended complaint and Sullivan opposes it. Result - Rosen gets exactly what they asked for.
3) Sullivan ask for permission to file additional pages with his motion to dismiss. Rosen does not support or oppose it. Result - Sullivan does NOT get what he asked for. Instead of 15 additional pages, he only gets 5.
Based on the above, it appears that Rosen is getting better treatment from the Judge than she is giving Sullivan.
The reverse argument is that she is granting Rosen's requests in order to limit their issues on appeal. And she ruled against Sullivan because she does not want to read the additional pages since she plans to grant the motion to dismiss.
We shall see...
Let's look at the Judge's actions so far.
1) Rosen ask for permission to file a second amended complaint and Sullivan opposes it. Result - Rosen gets exactly what they asked for.
2) Rosen ask for additional days to file said second amended complaint and Sullivan opposes it. Result - Rosen gets exactly what they asked for.
3) Sullivan ask for permission to file additional pages with his motion to dismiss. Rosen does not support or oppose it. Result - Sullivan does NOT get what he asked for. Instead of 15 additional pages, he only gets 5.
Based on the above, it appears that Rosen is getting better treatment from the Judge than she is giving Sullivan.
The reverse argument is that she is granting Rosen's requests in order to limit their issues on appeal. And she ruled against Sullivan because she does not want to read the additional pages since she plans to grant the motion to dismiss.
We shall see...
Quote:
I don't think the judge is going to want to waste her time on a stupid case like this. I bet the additional material CTIX wants to put in their response has something to do with the recent good news re trials, FDA, etc. That, of course, proves that Rosen/Mako's claim that it "can't" work is without merit.
Who knows, though, they may have identified individuals and are putting in evidence of the conspiracy. - Drano
(0)
(0)Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (IPIX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼