dilution is exactly what is wanted by original cre
Post# of 43064
it's actually one of the reasons why the stock has been taken below 10c (and held there for the last 2+ years)
the other outcome on tap >> equally desired >> is P2O's BK so then there is no cover required
the other potential of course would be selling IP for pennies on the dollar
all have something in common .. either a known *cover* price or no cover price
====
i can just see the whining now if P2O dilutes say 50M or 100M shares and the *impact* that has on PTOI
especially from the CON side of the original crew .. PRO side has long since slithered away
they are the CON side of another targeted stock that the PTOI CON side is the PRO side ..
it's all about an *off shore entity* working the cycle of money on poorly watched OTC stox ..
suspect up until P2O impacted *them* it's been rather lucrative
that said (as i've noted for 2 years now) .. the *goal* is to cellar box PTOI
each week the march to the cellar continues on ... and will .. until monies are transferred
and an indy BoD is seated (which of course is the big unknown time wise)
so if the choices come down to keeping doors open .. and getting NF NY back to showroom status re: operations .. clearly i'd take the D over the shutter
i think the key becomes what can change out the status quo for P2O .. because
obviously with an external sales component (OBG) .. what they don't control is
timing (again this isn't a 20c widget being marketed) .. so how does a significantly
targeted company disrupt the status quo?
to me that answer is worth exploring ~
i've always noted the impact of *fatigue* and how it can not only exhaust some but paralyze others
imo P2O's significant *assets* .. include not only an abusive short position of
significance (MILLIONS) .. a disruptive tech in its infancy .. but 200 *hard core*
investors who collectively are a force
4kids