Can anyone provide proof the Defendant violated th
Post# of 7795
Posted On: 01/01/2016 9:44:32 AM
Can anyone provide proof the Defendant violated the Court order as SFRX "alleged"? I can't find a post where the company or it's officers/directors were mentioned.
post·ing (pos'ting)
n.
1. Something posted, as for public viewing .
2. An electronic message sent to and displayed on an online forum .
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/posting
And how is it SFRX thinks they are ENTITLED to shareholder losses. Good thing Judge Cook didn't get fooled like Judge Foster appears to have.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Motion for Entry of Consent Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction, filed September 30, 2014. After reviewing the Motion, the court file, and record, the Court finds that it must REJECT the Motion in part as to the Consent Final Judgment, but GRANT the parties' agreed upon consent for entry of a Permanent Injunction. The Court finds that the Consent Final Judgment awards damages in the amount of over ten million dollar against the Defendant; however, these damages are not supported by any competent evidence presented to this Court to date .
The Court finds that Defendant is proceeding pro se, and in that capacity, admitted via his telephone appearance at the September 30, 2014, hearing that he "skimmed" the Motion and Consent Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction, and that he simply "wanted this to go away." He volunteered that after hearing from the Plaintiff in the prior hearing he had no problem in refraining from posting online criticisms of Plaintiff, and that in fact he had not posted anything negative regarding Plaintiff for over 48 hours. Accordingly, the Court accepts Defendant's consent to this injunction, but notes that absent such agreement, the Court would not be authorized under the law to compel such a broad based injunctive relief.
The Court has a duty to administer justice and cannot, in good conscience, rubber stamp that portion of the motion for Consent Final Judgment at this time, absent an evidentiary hearing and proof of entitlement to such damages .
It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Stipulated Motion for Entry of Consent Final Judgment is hereby REJECTED in part; the parties consent to issuance of a Permanent Injunction is GRANTED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Hillsborough County Florida this
6th day of October, 2014.
post·ing (pos'ting)
n.
1. Something posted, as for public viewing .
2. An electronic message sent to and displayed on an online forum .
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/posting
And how is it SFRX thinks they are ENTITLED to shareholder losses. Good thing Judge Cook didn't get fooled like Judge Foster appears to have.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Motion for Entry of Consent Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction, filed September 30, 2014. After reviewing the Motion, the court file, and record, the Court finds that it must REJECT the Motion in part as to the Consent Final Judgment, but GRANT the parties' agreed upon consent for entry of a Permanent Injunction. The Court finds that the Consent Final Judgment awards damages in the amount of over ten million dollar against the Defendant; however, these damages are not supported by any competent evidence presented to this Court to date .
The Court finds that Defendant is proceeding pro se, and in that capacity, admitted via his telephone appearance at the September 30, 2014, hearing that he "skimmed" the Motion and Consent Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction, and that he simply "wanted this to go away." He volunteered that after hearing from the Plaintiff in the prior hearing he had no problem in refraining from posting online criticisms of Plaintiff, and that in fact he had not posted anything negative regarding Plaintiff for over 48 hours. Accordingly, the Court accepts Defendant's consent to this injunction, but notes that absent such agreement, the Court would not be authorized under the law to compel such a broad based injunctive relief.
The Court has a duty to administer justice and cannot, in good conscience, rubber stamp that portion of the motion for Consent Final Judgment at this time, absent an evidentiary hearing and proof of entitlement to such damages .
It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Stipulated Motion for Entry of Consent Final Judgment is hereby REJECTED in part; the parties consent to issuance of a Permanent Injunction is GRANTED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Hillsborough County Florida this
6th day of October, 2014.
(1)
(1)Seafarer Exploration (SFRX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼