Perhaps you were, and perhaps I was right. Another

Perhaps you were, and perhaps I was right. Another poster going by Crawford 04 posted very similar types of questions with seriously negative overtones. When you pop onto a board like this where much has been learned since initial sales, and much of that learning was through hours of reading posts by company, fellow investors, distributors, store owners/operators and customers, and you ask questions about a pink sheet stock pointing at avenues of information typically used for DD with big board or at least audited fully reporting companies, then what would you expect? Read through posts. There are enough to keep you busy for a while. Why would anyone expect proof from numbers? Day traders typically trade on hype and momentum. They don't care about revenues for obscure pinks, or they're plunking down slot money on a longshot or hype driven pop. The longs on this board are long on this stock for what's been learned in total about the company and it's products, and not based mainly on numbers from reports like a bean counter would do. There's a time and a place for that, but ground floor investment in a pink sheet stock isn't it. Your style is almost identical to Crawford 04, and he wasn't finding it easy to share gloom and doom with those who are convinced otherwise either. If you need proof, you'll just have to wait until it's there or some analysts are willing tell you there is. There aren't any right now because this company isn't paying anyone to pump their stock. They won't need to. We also know that those unpaid "helpers" send trolls to spread fear as if by terrorists of the stock world, to teach companies a "lesson" for not paying them. This company will do just fine on their present course.