$TPAC Mega DD: $TPAC (Updated 12/12/15)Here is
Post# of 74540
Posted On: 12/15/2015 6:30:06 PM
$TPAC Mega DD:
$TPAC (Updated 12/12/15)Here is a company with no convertible debt and that has stated repeatedly that it will not R/S unless to uplist while already in a position of strength; company will also not take on any new convertible notes. There is a wealth of information on TPAC to take heed of, some of which I will provide and other info which can be turned up doing your own independent research as I have. On top of being a stock free of toxic financing and that will not R/S, we have a CEO that communicates regularly with shareholders via email and Twitter.
Bill McKay, CEO, strikes me as a gentleman and a person of integrity, something rarely seen in the OTC. The management team here consists of many aerospace veterans with ties to the major players in the field. Bill was also CEO and founder of Harbin and of CEO Acromil Corporation: http://www.acromil.com/ He is a B.A., J.D., and M.B.A. His bio can be found on the 'Management Team' link pasted below.
Greg Archer, Director for TPAC, spent 24 years as an executive with Northrup Grumman. While this is impressive, both in terms of loyalty and position, it is the connection to the higher-ups in supply and procurement that matter, seeing as Northrup just won the Pentagon bid - for the first time in decades - to an $80B dollar bomber contract for the Navy and Air Force(see 'Bomber Contract' link below).
In order to sell to the govt., a company needs a CAGE code. TPAC has one. In order to sell aerospace parts, NAVAIR certification is needed. We are one of only six companies in the U.S. that is NAVAIR certified, and the only one company in China that has NAVAIR cert. China just announced COMAC's 174 passenger C919 as competitor to U.S. counterparts Boeing and Airbus. We are also the only producer of self-lubricating bearings in China and thus serve to provide them with deep discounts on importation and taxes. Our bearings are approved at 25k rotations and are soon to be tested at 100k rotations, with degradation rate at the aforementioned turns being less than the thickness of a human hair. We also have a few very coveted aerospace certs: SAE-AS 81820 and SAE-AS 81934. As a quick aside, NAVAIR takes, on average, 5yrs and several million dollars - not to mention patience and meticulous completion of paperwork - to acquire; we have.
In the works are two acquisitions and a joint venture. Upon completion of the acquisitions, Mr. McKay will be buying back $2M in TPAC common shares. We are also looking at purchase orders of varying sizes coming down the pipeline. Many parts have already been trialed and some have already received approval. Substantive PR to come. (See Twitter conversation below).
****Update 12/8/15 TPAC Begins 1.8B Share Buyback: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/trans-pacifi...2015-12-09 *****
'Management Team': http://tpacbearings.com/management-team
'Bomber Contract': http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2...rs/412720/
Post with link to CAGE code for verification:
Here is NAVAIR's link: http://www.navair.navy.mil/
Feel free to get in touch with them directly for an inquiry or with TPAC directly for an image and/or verification of this and other certifications.
COMAC C-919: http://english.comac.cc/products/ca/pi/
***********UPDATE(12/12/15; PR from 12/10/15; First, I will post a quote that aligns with the Twitter conversation below, and then I will post the link to the news itself)
Quote: ". We have worked very hard in the development and marketing of these bearings and are the only company in China able to meet the exacting blueprint requirements for performance"
COMAC may be a strong possibility as a current and future partner. This is China's version of Boeing or Airbus. The C919 is COMAC's new 174 passenger jet. $100k purchase order is in my opinion a test run; and should it go well..... yes, exactly - money in the bank and a lot of other smaller companies ordering from us, COMAC's bearing supplier.
12/10/15 News(link): http://www.marketwatch.com/story/trans-pacifi...2015-12-10 *******************
'Twitter Conversation': TPAC Bearings @TPACbearings Oct 16
To date we've seen 68 parts that COMAC needs that we are the only Chinese company qualified to produce. We continue to review other part #s
4 retweets 6 likes
Reply Retweet 4
Like 6
More
Scott Marvel @scottmarvel1 Nov 3
@TPACbearings Hope progress is moving forward. Any new updates coming down the pipe soon? Also have you started running any trial parts?
0 retweets 0 likes
Reply Retweet
Like
More
TPAC Bearings @TPACbearings Nov 3
@scottmarvel1 we don't need more trial parts. We have been approved. PR will be issued with substantive news
RETWEETS
3,036
LIKES
2,750
William SeymourBobby McCartneyTammy T. BarreraKyle LyonLisa RiosBerneice SingletoEmily RichardsonTina M. HarrisTasha Marcum
9:15 PM - 3 Nov 2015 · Details
SAE-AS 81820: http://standards.sae.org/as81820/
SAE-AS 81934: http://standards.sae.org/as81934/
TPAC's home page: http://tpacbearings.com/
TPAC Business Plan in pdf format:
http://tpacbearings.com/sites/default/files/t...s-plan.pdf
TPAC PR's, etc: http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/TPAC/quote
I hope this has been of service to some of you out there in search of aerospace plays, or plays that have no toxic debt and will not R/S(unless to uplist). I have left out any technical analysis on this one but stockcharts is a great place to get the specs; most of you already know that. We have had very steady volume as of lately and momentum has been picking up in anticipation of both a technical run and a fundamental run based upon an upcoming fundamental catalyst. Good luck to all and, as usual, should you like the DD provided here, please be kind enough to spread this so other investors can take notice. It helps the company, current investors(such as myself and other TPAC message board posters), and potential investors looking for ground floor entries in solid companies.
Thank you for reading.
$TPAC (Updated 12/12/15)Here is a company with no convertible debt and that has stated repeatedly that it will not R/S unless to uplist while already in a position of strength; company will also not take on any new convertible notes. There is a wealth of information on TPAC to take heed of, some of which I will provide and other info which can be turned up doing your own independent research as I have. On top of being a stock free of toxic financing and that will not R/S, we have a CEO that communicates regularly with shareholders via email and Twitter.
Bill McKay, CEO, strikes me as a gentleman and a person of integrity, something rarely seen in the OTC. The management team here consists of many aerospace veterans with ties to the major players in the field. Bill was also CEO and founder of Harbin and of CEO Acromil Corporation: http://www.acromil.com/ He is a B.A., J.D., and M.B.A. His bio can be found on the 'Management Team' link pasted below.
Greg Archer, Director for TPAC, spent 24 years as an executive with Northrup Grumman. While this is impressive, both in terms of loyalty and position, it is the connection to the higher-ups in supply and procurement that matter, seeing as Northrup just won the Pentagon bid - for the first time in decades - to an $80B dollar bomber contract for the Navy and Air Force(see 'Bomber Contract' link below).
In order to sell to the govt., a company needs a CAGE code. TPAC has one. In order to sell aerospace parts, NAVAIR certification is needed. We are one of only six companies in the U.S. that is NAVAIR certified, and the only one company in China that has NAVAIR cert. China just announced COMAC's 174 passenger C919 as competitor to U.S. counterparts Boeing and Airbus. We are also the only producer of self-lubricating bearings in China and thus serve to provide them with deep discounts on importation and taxes. Our bearings are approved at 25k rotations and are soon to be tested at 100k rotations, with degradation rate at the aforementioned turns being less than the thickness of a human hair. We also have a few very coveted aerospace certs: SAE-AS 81820 and SAE-AS 81934. As a quick aside, NAVAIR takes, on average, 5yrs and several million dollars - not to mention patience and meticulous completion of paperwork - to acquire; we have.
In the works are two acquisitions and a joint venture. Upon completion of the acquisitions, Mr. McKay will be buying back $2M in TPAC common shares. We are also looking at purchase orders of varying sizes coming down the pipeline. Many parts have already been trialed and some have already received approval. Substantive PR to come. (See Twitter conversation below).
****Update 12/8/15 TPAC Begins 1.8B Share Buyback: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/trans-pacifi...2015-12-09 *****
'Management Team': http://tpacbearings.com/management-team
'Bomber Contract': http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2...rs/412720/
Post with link to CAGE code for verification:
Here is NAVAIR's link: http://www.navair.navy.mil/
Feel free to get in touch with them directly for an inquiry or with TPAC directly for an image and/or verification of this and other certifications.
COMAC C-919: http://english.comac.cc/products/ca/pi/
***********UPDATE(12/12/15; PR from 12/10/15; First, I will post a quote that aligns with the Twitter conversation below, and then I will post the link to the news itself)
Quote: ". We have worked very hard in the development and marketing of these bearings and are the only company in China able to meet the exacting blueprint requirements for performance"
COMAC may be a strong possibility as a current and future partner. This is China's version of Boeing or Airbus. The C919 is COMAC's new 174 passenger jet. $100k purchase order is in my opinion a test run; and should it go well..... yes, exactly - money in the bank and a lot of other smaller companies ordering from us, COMAC's bearing supplier.
12/10/15 News(link): http://www.marketwatch.com/story/trans-pacifi...2015-12-10 *******************
'Twitter Conversation': TPAC Bearings @TPACbearings Oct 16
To date we've seen 68 parts that COMAC needs that we are the only Chinese company qualified to produce. We continue to review other part #s
4 retweets 6 likes
Reply Retweet 4
Like 6
More
Scott Marvel @scottmarvel1 Nov 3
@TPACbearings Hope progress is moving forward. Any new updates coming down the pipe soon? Also have you started running any trial parts?
0 retweets 0 likes
Reply Retweet
Like
More
TPAC Bearings @TPACbearings Nov 3
@scottmarvel1 we don't need more trial parts. We have been approved. PR will be issued with substantive news
RETWEETS
3,036
LIKES
2,750
William SeymourBobby McCartneyTammy T. BarreraKyle LyonLisa RiosBerneice SingletoEmily RichardsonTina M. HarrisTasha Marcum
9:15 PM - 3 Nov 2015 · Details
SAE-AS 81820: http://standards.sae.org/as81820/
SAE-AS 81934: http://standards.sae.org/as81934/
TPAC's home page: http://tpacbearings.com/
TPAC Business Plan in pdf format:
http://tpacbearings.com/sites/default/files/t...s-plan.pdf
TPAC PR's, etc: http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/TPAC/quote
I hope this has been of service to some of you out there in search of aerospace plays, or plays that have no toxic debt and will not R/S(unless to uplist). I have left out any technical analysis on this one but stockcharts is a great place to get the specs; most of you already know that. We have had very steady volume as of lately and momentum has been picking up in anticipation of both a technical run and a fundamental run based upon an upcoming fundamental catalyst. Good luck to all and, as usual, should you like the DD provided here, please be kind enough to spread this so other investors can take notice. It helps the company, current investors(such as myself and other TPAC message board posters), and potential investors looking for ground floor entries in solid companies.
Thank you for reading.
(0)
(0)
Do your own DD. Assume everyone here is either an amateur trader/investor or a paid interest such as a compensated pumper/basher. My posts are strictly for entertainment purposes. I am not on Wall St., do not work for a group, and only get paid when my personal investments materialize. I am only responsible for my own gains and losses; no one is to blame for my mistakes or for any advice taken from postings; likewise, I am not to blame for any advice you take of mine, regardless of gains or losses from doing so. Good luck to all; may you live long and prosper greatly.
Scroll down for more posts ▼