PTOI >> re: that pacer info .. ;) the Vexatiou
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 12/14/2015 6:07:32 PM
Re: stocks4john #32154
PTOI >> re: that pacer info .. 
the Vexatious Litigant noted on 10.27.15 by the (Canada) Ontario Court Judge ..
just lost another one .. and this one is out on PACER .. Judge signed it on 12.10.15
Quote:
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge
re: that other *loss* .. deemed OT ..
gotta love the description of one classified as a Vexatious Litigant
just a reminder of what that meaning translates out to .. (per wiki)
Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender.
A single action, even a frivolous one, is usually not enough to raise a litigant to the level of being declared vexatious. Rather, a pattern of frivolous legal actions is typically required to rise to the level of vexatious. Repeated and severe instances by a single lawyer or firm can result in eventual disbarment.
Some jurisdictions have a list of vexatious litigants: people who have repeatedly abused the legal system. Because lawyers could be disbarred for participating in this abuse of the legal process, vexatious litigants are often unable to retain legal counsel, and such litigants therefore represent themselves in court. Those on the vexatious litigant list are usually either forbidden from any further legal action, or are required to obtain prior permission from a senior judge before taking any legal action. The process by which a person is added to the list varies among jurisdictions. In liberal democratic jurisdictions, declaring someone a vexatious litigant is considered to be a serious measure and rarely occurs, as judges and officials are reluctant to curtail a person's access to the courts.
These legal actions occur in some countries of the former British Empire, where the Common Law System still remains: Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, UK, and US, which are specified below. The Civil (Codified/Continental) Law does not provide this kind of gate to limit equal access of citizens to the justice system.
======
even better is what was revealed under oath re: those who trash stox for *payment* ..
just a reminder how this *leakage* was utilized by Vexatious Litigant's camp on 5.1.13 to *tank* PTOI
decisively from 50c to (from memory so i may be off .. 29c) that was what i've referred to as *depo gate*
how interesting to see what is good for the Vexatious Litigant returned in total ..
yep the myth of non payment re: stock *demoters* >> just got obliterated >> courtesy of Vexatious Litigant testimony (under oath) via discovery >> of course those specifics
will have to be posted elsewhere .. courtesy of TOUs that shift to suit .. and because of who this *impacts*
it is what it is .. but like other aspects connected to >> er >> LONDON CALLING .. it will spread like wildfire
so now we know why *angst* went off the charts .. because *exposure* for the next level of FILTH is just around the corner ..
4kids
the Vexatious Litigant noted on 10.27.15 by the (Canada) Ontario Court Judge ..
just lost another one .. and this one is out on PACER .. Judge signed it on 12.10.15
Quote:
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge
re: that other *loss* .. deemed OT ..
gotta love the description of one classified as a Vexatious Litigant
just a reminder of what that meaning translates out to .. (per wiki)
Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender.
A single action, even a frivolous one, is usually not enough to raise a litigant to the level of being declared vexatious. Rather, a pattern of frivolous legal actions is typically required to rise to the level of vexatious. Repeated and severe instances by a single lawyer or firm can result in eventual disbarment.
Some jurisdictions have a list of vexatious litigants: people who have repeatedly abused the legal system. Because lawyers could be disbarred for participating in this abuse of the legal process, vexatious litigants are often unable to retain legal counsel, and such litigants therefore represent themselves in court. Those on the vexatious litigant list are usually either forbidden from any further legal action, or are required to obtain prior permission from a senior judge before taking any legal action. The process by which a person is added to the list varies among jurisdictions. In liberal democratic jurisdictions, declaring someone a vexatious litigant is considered to be a serious measure and rarely occurs, as judges and officials are reluctant to curtail a person's access to the courts.
These legal actions occur in some countries of the former British Empire, where the Common Law System still remains: Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, UK, and US, which are specified below. The Civil (Codified/Continental) Law does not provide this kind of gate to limit equal access of citizens to the justice system.
======
even better is what was revealed under oath re: those who trash stox for *payment* ..
just a reminder how this *leakage* was utilized by Vexatious Litigant's camp on 5.1.13 to *tank* PTOI
decisively from 50c to (from memory so i may be off .. 29c) that was what i've referred to as *depo gate*
how interesting to see what is good for the Vexatious Litigant returned in total ..
yep the myth of non payment re: stock *demoters* >> just got obliterated >> courtesy of Vexatious Litigant testimony (under oath) via discovery >> of course those specifics
will have to be posted elsewhere .. courtesy of TOUs that shift to suit .. and because of who this *impacts*
it is what it is .. but like other aspects connected to >> er >> LONDON CALLING .. it will spread like wildfire
so now we know why *angst* went off the charts .. because *exposure* for the next level of FILTH is just around the corner ..
4kids
(0)
(0)