JIC >> the *usual* outcome .. comes to pass .. *there* ..
===
fourkids_9pets Member Level Sunday, 12/13/15 02:31:06 PM
Re: A deleted message
Post # 288216 of 288216 Go
it's not rocket science .. but i'll spell it out to the best of my abilities
this isn't an either/or *conversation*
there have been times when drive bys have resulted in a handful of cars (activity) on site .. and times
when there have been far more vehicles (activity .. bay doors open .. yada yada) also noted re: drive bys
let's think back to actual facts ..
everyone with interest can source company filings specific to fuel produced in the Fall of 2013
*after* RH and JB wrested back control of P2O
P2O mgmt in the Fall of 2013 .. successfully showed via the the beast (3) .. P2O's capabilities
it is my contention that besides OBG's *interest* in P2O's capabilities for their diverse clientele ..
that others had an interest .. one of whom .. (ECO) clearly created an LLC in the First Q of 2014
to *pursue* said interests
which is why mgmt effectively *shut down* all aspects .. because first *group* of buyers .. was in the queue
imo when knowledge of the group behind *southern state* deal is sourced .. it too will *imo* reveal an LLC
created in early 2014 ..
i doubt the *
known* interest re: P2O is *limited* to just OBG .. ECO .. MC .. and the *souther state* folks
now keeping up with what is happens with *diverse clientele* .. is that there would be *feedstock* said
diverse clientele would want tested .. (the given is the ability to scale)
and that is clearly being done .. via equipment contained within a lab ..
let's think about who could do those tests?
yep ... in one
suspect co.s founder's decision to go to consulting status pertained more to not *diluting* P2O's treasury
while mgmt has to wait out aspects out of their control
i presumed this was obvious .. but P2O isn't in control of the financing .. and anyone who has ever
worked with large ticket items (500k to 5M) .. is fully cognizant of the complexities and real world time lines
in place specific to that funding .. if you factor in public funds vs private .. it gets even more complicated
again .. P2O changed their business model by Jan 2014 .. with the reality of preservation of capital being
*clearly* a top goal
i don't even have to be married to an analyst to understand that
the cost of remaining a fully filing pubco .. is *monumental* at this stage of P2O's execution and imo not at all
worth it ..
it is what it is ..
so i hope that answers your post (quoted above) ..
btw if i remember correctly from the massive amount of PRs' out of RH in 2015 ..
some of the lab equipment was noted .. i do believe a few posted via this very venue .. the cost and significance of those purchases
you have a happy holiday ..
4kids
===
fourkids_9pets Member Level Sunday, 12/13/15 02:31:06 PM
Re: A deleted message
Post # 288216 of 288216 Go
it's not rocket science .. but i'll spell it out to the best of my abilities
Quote:
I don't understand you at all. Every single time I drive by and report that nothing was going on, you are the first one to reply that no I'm wrong you have people driving by all the time and they see tons and tons of activity going on. Now you say why the hell would anything be going on at p20. Stop making excuses for every single time this company takes a $hit!
this isn't an either/or *conversation*
there have been times when drive bys have resulted in a handful of cars (activity) on site .. and times
when there have been far more vehicles (activity .. bay doors open .. yada yada) also noted re: drive bys
let's think back to actual facts ..
everyone with interest can source company filings specific to fuel produced in the Fall of 2013
*after* RH and JB wrested back control of P2O
P2O mgmt in the Fall of 2013 .. successfully showed via the the beast (3) .. P2O's capabilities
it is my contention that besides OBG's *interest* in P2O's capabilities for their diverse clientele ..
that others had an interest .. one of whom .. (ECO) clearly created an LLC in the First Q of 2014
to *pursue* said interests
which is why mgmt effectively *shut down* all aspects .. because first *group* of buyers .. was in the queue
imo when knowledge of the group behind *southern state* deal is sourced .. it too will *imo* reveal an LLC
created in early 2014 ..
i doubt the *
known* interest re: P2O is *limited* to just OBG .. ECO .. MC .. and the *souther state* folks
now keeping up with what is happens with *diverse clientele* .. is that there would be *feedstock* said
diverse clientele would want tested .. (the given is the ability to scale)
and that is clearly being done .. via equipment contained within a lab ..
let's think about who could do those tests?
yep ... in one
suspect co.s founder's decision to go to consulting status pertained more to not *diluting* P2O's treasury
while mgmt has to wait out aspects out of their control
i presumed this was obvious .. but P2O isn't in control of the financing .. and anyone who has ever
worked with large ticket items (500k to 5M) .. is fully cognizant of the complexities and real world time lines
in place specific to that funding .. if you factor in public funds vs private .. it gets even more complicated
again .. P2O changed their business model by Jan 2014 .. with the reality of preservation of capital being
*clearly* a top goal
i don't even have to be married to an analyst to understand that
the cost of remaining a fully filing pubco .. is *monumental* at this stage of P2O's execution and imo not at all
worth it ..
it is what it is ..
so i hope that answers your post (quoted above) ..
btw if i remember correctly from the massive amount of PRs' out of RH in 2015 ..
some of the lab equipment was noted .. i do believe a few posted via this very venue .. the cost and significance of those purchases
you have a happy holiday ..
4kids
