I am willing to listen to the case being made for
Post# of 12259
Under the laws of the State of Nevada, the Company can implement a proportional reverse split of the common shares without the need for a shareholder vote. It is absolutely critical for shareholders to understand what this means and why a reverse split of the authorized shares with an equal and proportional reverse split of the common shares outstanding will protect shareholders from the typical outcome seen in reverse splits.
Lets hope the Company understands that in order for a ‘new, higher share price’ to be respected and maintained following any reverse split will require fundamental value-building events to occur immediately after effecting a reverse split.