I always thought a settlement scenario could be wh
Post# of 11038
Posted On: 11/13/2015 10:59:35 AM
I always thought a settlement scenario could be what you describe.. We just have to wait.
For example, giving them shares with a par value of say .0025 even though shares are lower. If a div is going to be given at .011 again then COR would simply need to be given say 33% of the difference (since they will own shares and future dividends) or 150m shares and call it a day.
If this were trading on the pinks the number of shares could be much less. Shares could be trading much much higher than what they were before so something fair might be 20% (even lower). It all depends on your assumptions!
ALL IMHO
For example, giving them shares with a par value of say .0025 even though shares are lower. If a div is going to be given at .011 again then COR would simply need to be given say 33% of the difference (since they will own shares and future dividends) or 150m shares and call it a day.
If this were trading on the pinks the number of shares could be much less. Shares could be trading much much higher than what they were before so something fair might be 20% (even lower). It all depends on your assumptions!
ALL IMHO
(0)
(0)Calissio Resources Group, Inc. (CRGP) Stock Research Links
PLEASE READ IF YOU READ MY POSTS
I invested in Calissio Resources Group because I considered the financial statements warranted an investment. For every reader here that has been paying attention to my posts, please note the following:
1) I am not licensed to give investment advice. Everything expressed here is an opinion of my own for discussion purposes.
2) The only thing I know about the upcoming merger is that typically they are good for investors. A premium is typically offered when companies go private from what I understand. I certainly was and still am an investor before this announcement was made.
3) Finally, regarding the current OS, while there is lots of conjecture, I must rely on the only available information out there which has been presented in PRs. Therefore, OS as of the last PR was 242m. Consequently, I don't believe there is reason to believe I am a majority holder, despite recent purchases, without making a large degree of assumptions.
If anyone is wondering why I am posting this, it is because I want to make sure no one misinterprets my posts or considers I have any intent on the board other than to share potential ideas/speculate on possibilities.
I invested in Calissio Resources Group because I considered the financial statements warranted an investment. For every reader here that has been paying attention to my posts, please note the following:
1) I am not licensed to give investment advice. Everything expressed here is an opinion of my own for discussion purposes.
2) The only thing I know about the upcoming merger is that typically they are good for investors. A premium is typically offered when companies go private from what I understand. I certainly was and still am an investor before this announcement was made.
3) Finally, regarding the current OS, while there is lots of conjecture, I must rely on the only available information out there which has been presented in PRs. Therefore, OS as of the last PR was 242m. Consequently, I don't believe there is reason to believe I am a majority holder, despite recent purchases, without making a large degree of assumptions.
If anyone is wondering why I am posting this, it is because I want to make sure no one misinterprets my posts or considers I have any intent on the board other than to share potential ideas/speculate on possibilities.
Scroll down for more posts ▼