i've never discounted PTOI shares being legitimate
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 11/03/2015 6:51:12 AM
Re: Commando911 #32083
i've never discounted PTOI shares being legitimately sold
what i track is *volume* and *trades* .. and %s
in 2010 .. i noted the use then of *wash trading orchestration* and a ratio
that ran then of 3 to 1 to 5 to 1 .. imo that ratio has stayed pretty consistent
over the years (3 fake to 1 legit to 5 fake to 1 legit)
that is why *volume* (and the lack of it) matters *imo*
as i noted in 2014 .. imo *most* who wanted out of P2O >> had sold PTOI
by Jan - Feb 2014
btw .. i have no doubts that should P2O deliver another extension
of Eco's deadline sans an articulate and informative update .. it will
be utilized to orchestrate off of ... since Sept 2012 .. (with one exception
in Jan 2013) >> the constant has been to compress PTOI via resets
and *raids* have been tailored specifically to certain P2O events including
the CC (timed to JB's comments .. re: K filed in 2013 and *post by MLM*
re: depo gate on 5.1.13 to break 50c decisively .. i termed it depo gate)
imo colluding entities have no choice but to *set up* the next round DOWN
(that is what happens when a stock is taken too low) ..
and each round DOWN on PTOI .. absolutely *collects* shares from exhausted or fed up investors
interestingly tho' based on interaction 2014/2015 with *every* alias *elsewhere*
(approx 60 to 75 that represents collectively about 200 in total) .. *many*
have made the decision to see their investment in P2O through ..
many but not all and clearly investor emotions can be played with .. especially EOY
which is why in P2O's shoes .. i would have been in front of the 10.29.15 *date*
be interesting to see what Nov's *volume* and %s is/are compared to October's and July's
4kids
what i track is *volume* and *trades* .. and %s
in 2010 .. i noted the use then of *wash trading orchestration* and a ratio
that ran then of 3 to 1 to 5 to 1 .. imo that ratio has stayed pretty consistent
over the years (3 fake to 1 legit to 5 fake to 1 legit)
that is why *volume* (and the lack of it) matters *imo*
as i noted in 2014 .. imo *most* who wanted out of P2O >> had sold PTOI
by Jan - Feb 2014
btw .. i have no doubts that should P2O deliver another extension
of Eco's deadline sans an articulate and informative update .. it will
be utilized to orchestrate off of ... since Sept 2012 .. (with one exception
in Jan 2013) >> the constant has been to compress PTOI via resets
and *raids* have been tailored specifically to certain P2O events including
the CC (timed to JB's comments .. re: K filed in 2013 and *post by MLM*
re: depo gate on 5.1.13 to break 50c decisively .. i termed it depo gate)
imo colluding entities have no choice but to *set up* the next round DOWN
(that is what happens when a stock is taken too low) ..
and each round DOWN on PTOI .. absolutely *collects* shares from exhausted or fed up investors
interestingly tho' based on interaction 2014/2015 with *every* alias *elsewhere*
(approx 60 to 75 that represents collectively about 200 in total) .. *many*
have made the decision to see their investment in P2O through ..
many but not all and clearly investor emotions can be played with .. especially EOY
which is why in P2O's shoes .. i would have been in front of the 10.29.15 *date*
be interesting to see what Nov's *volume* and %s is/are compared to October's and July's
4kids
(0)
(0)