I'm all in, without a doubt as I believe the brand
Post# of 15187
The statement though is just a rehash of the June statement in a different manner. Not put together all too well and in some instances not making sense. I'm big on sense and logic when it comes to business. The thing that bothers me, and I am restating this, is the non-sequitur and unnecessary comments about bashers and enemies. It's just not necessary in a CEO company statement. Perhaps I'm being a bit too fine with English, logic, clarity and transparency, but I live it every day and I know what sounds good and what sound like a repetitive narrative.
If you're going to concentrate on brand and product then allow the statements to focus on brand and product and potential distribution. BC just said it before, we all know about the detractors, for what reason should we give them of voice? Why give them any airtime or any play? Why give them any power or authority or let it be known to any followers on FB that they affect our behavior? They damn sure better not affect Veal's behavior, but it looks as if he is thinking about them by giving them mention. That's really my only beef, and again I'm probably being too fine having some experience at the helm.