I am purposely creating a new post so as not to gi

I am purposely creating a new post so as not to give the impression that I am replying to anyone in particular.
Nano one time took the position to notify share holders of much of what they were doing and this back-fired in their face. Battelle was harrased with phone calls fishing for more information, whether this an attempt to sabotage the relationship, I can't say but suspect it may have been. Constant bashes about wording and meaningless items and even calling the company and berating the secretary to the point of tears. How does a piss ant, pink sheet stock deserve this attention? These appear to be tactics to me, but then what do I know, I am not an expert in stock market and business tactics and still am gullible enough to believe that most people are honest and not calculating, I am learning different and nothing surprises me anymore.
How can anyone blame them from a human standpoint for clamming up and only releasing sure things. Hear that again, sure things.
From a technology and business standpoint, what honest investor, say again, honest investor can blame Nanologix for holding their cards close to their chest and only releasing information about protected technologies and past sales history and not showing their cards or strategies for the future?
Smart, intelligent and protected.
Hopefully we are seeing some new investors, I have continued to add shares as I could throughout my 8 years and what I have spent is already absorbed financially so I will sit on what I have or buy more when I can.
Good luck to all, thank you Bret for working your 10-12 hour days, hopefully we can both retire at some not to distant future point.
George