Yeah, like I said, those wieners are not going to

Yeah, like I said, those wieners are not going to go against the grain. Even the big boys wouldn't do it with Lumber Liquidators. They tucked their tails and jumped into the shorters camp cause they knew the bashers hype couldn't be reversed without really good news, mostly proof in the form of court rulings.That's even though investors like myself that don't partake in short selling have all of the facts and know pretty much what to expect, and that the stock is a great investment even at it's current price. Most firms just don't want to take on the risk when momentum is negative, activists are pursuing the shorting effort zealously, and there is even a shred of doubt as to whether or not those in the company who were sloppy with legal compliance left any other undiscovered skeletons in the closet. I say buy as a long investment and make good money, but it's hard to find professionals willing to publicly agree. Also, I'm sure many of them were more than happy to short the stock because they knew the proof would take a while to transpire and the bigger the short attack the bigger the profits. I realize I'm rambling on about another company, but I'm trying to point out how similar the stocks are once the smear campaigns have triggered massive shorting. It's vicious and requires proof contrary to bashing efforts before they'll cover and leave. Like Roger said, it is what it is.