Court Issues Pretrial Schedule for Worlds v. Activision Blizzard Lawsuit
Marketwired - Thu Sep 17, 7:36AM CDT
Judge Denise Casper of The U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts has issued the Joint Pretrial Schedule for the Worlds Inc. (OTCQB: WDDD) v. Activision Blizzard Inc. et al patent infringement lawsuit with the following dates:
Worlds comments on Activision Markman ruling; shares +5.4%
Seeking Alpha - at Seeking Alpha - Mon Jun 29, 9:59AM CDT
ATVI: 32.07 (+0.34)
Worlds Receives Favorable Markman Ruling in Lawsuit Against Activision Blizzard
Marketwired - Mon Jun 29, 7:30AM CDT
Worlds Inc. (OTCQB: WDDD) received a favorable Markman Order from Judge Denise Casper of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on June 26th related to its patent infringement lawsuit against Activision Blizzard, Inc., Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. and Activision Publishing, Inc. (Activision et al)
ATVI: 32.07 (+0.34)
Worlds +33.5%; Markman ruling arrives for Activision suit
Seeking Alpha - at Seeking Alpha - Fri Jun 26, 2:36PM CDT
Notable tech gainers/decliners: Z, TZOO, WDDD, WATT, MOBL, DSKY, SPRT
Seeking Alpha - at Seeking Alpha - Mon Apr 27, 2:06PM CDT
WATT: 6.91 (-0.11), TZOO: 9.72 (+0.56), SPRT: 1.24 (+0.02), MOBL: 3.83 (+0.04), DSKY: 11.72 (+0.14), Z: 33.45 (+1.85)
Notable tech gainers/decliners: CYBR, GEOS, MIFI, VRNS, QRVO, SANM
Seeking Alpha - at Seeking Alpha - Tue Apr 07, 2:18PM CDT
GEOS: 15.07 (-0.87), QRVO: 45.66 (+0.40), SREV: 4.49 (-0.01), CYBR: 52.91 (-0.46), VRNS: 16.15 (-0.35), ATHM: 33.25 (+0.05), SANM: 22.65 (unch), MIFI: 2.47 (-0.03)
Worlds now +26.7% after expanding Activision suit
Seeking Alpha - at Seeking Alpha - Wed Feb 11, 11:56AM CST
Worlds +8% after adding new Activision games to suit
Seeking Alpha - at Seeking Alpha - Wed Feb 11, 10:08AM CST
Worlds Inc. Adds Two More Billion-Dollar Activision Games to Patent Infringement Suit
Marketwired - Wed Feb 11, 8:45AM CST
Worlds Inc. (OTCBB: WDDD) has supplemented its claims in its patent infringement lawsuit against Activision Blizzard, Inc., Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. and Activision Publishing, Inc.'s (Activision et al) to include two recently released Activision games: World of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor and Call of Duty(R): Advanced Warfare. Worlds believes these and other games that are part of Activision's multi-billion dollar franchise infringe upon the same Worlds' intellectual property. The amended claim can be found on the US Gov't Pacer website, www.pacer.gov/ (registration required).
ATVI: 32.07 (+0.34)
Congress takes another stab at patent law reform
Seeking Alpha - at Seeking Alpha - Sun Feb 08, 2:32PM CST
VRNG: 0.41 (+0.01), WILN: 1.99 (+0.06), ACTG: 9.90 (+0.17), PRKR: 0.20 (+0.01), MARA: 1.98 (-0.02), FNJN: 1.66 (-0.07), DSS: 0.19 (-0.01), SPEX: 0.46 (+0.03), VHC: 4.00 (+0.05)
Patent stocks rally after Supreme Court's Teva ruling
Seeking Alpha - at Seeking Alpha - Tue Jan 20, 1:15PM CST
WILN: 1.99 (+0.06), PRKR: 0.20 (+0.01), FNJN: 1.66 (-0.07), SPEX: 0.46 (+0.03)
Worlds: Expect Favorable Findings From The Markman Hearing
Patent Parsing - Seeking Alpha - Mon Dec 08, 1:54AM CST
Worlds (OTCQB: WDDD ) and Activision (NASDAQ: ATVI ) are in the midst of a patent infringement battle. Defendant Activision publishes several video games in the highly successful Call of Duty and World of Warcraft franchises. Plaintiff Worlds asserts...
ATVI: 32.07 (+0.34)
Hudson Bay Wages War Against Worlds to Force Warrant Price Cut
at The Street - Thu Oct 23, 3:24PM CDT
The dispute centers on an error in an SEC filing by the patent monetization company.
ATVI: 32.07 (+0.34)
Worlds Inc. vs. Activision Blizzard Patent Infringement Markman Hearing Completed; Awaiting Ruling, Trial Date
Marketwire - Mon Oct 06, 8:05AM CDT
The Markman hearing for the patent infringement suit by Worlds Inc. (OTCQB: WDDD) against Activision Blizzard, Inc., Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. and Activision Publishing, Inc. (Activision Blizzard et al) (ATVI), was held October 3, 2014 to address various aspects of the infringement suit claims and how the words in the 11 disputed "constructions" in the claims should be construed for jury consideration. The additional purpose is for the court to determine the meaning and intent of the language used in the claims.