Its not panic, its a preventive measure as I would
Post# of 11035
Posted On: 10/07/2015 12:16:55 AM
Its not panic, its a preventive measure as I would rather the court entertain the implications on appointing a receiver. The DTCC would be the next in line concerning liability and brokers will do what DTCC said and blame the DTCC. Sure it opens them up for lawsuits, but I would much rather avoid lawsuits altogether. Thats why I'm not suggesting joining the action as a party of interest or anything of that sort.
COR talks as if they are injured and they will be getting funds from those who profited illegally but they use language that makes it read as if it was CRGP and its affiliates but only reading very carefully might one see that they are going for shareholders. Better be safe than sorry IMHO
COR talks as if they are injured and they will be getting funds from those who profited illegally but they use language that makes it read as if it was CRGP and its affiliates but only reading very carefully might one see that they are going for shareholders. Better be safe than sorry IMHO
(0)
(0)Calissio Resources Group, Inc. (CRGP) Stock Research Links
PLEASE READ IF YOU READ MY POSTS
I invested in Calissio Resources Group because I considered the financial statements warranted an investment. For every reader here that has been paying attention to my posts, please note the following:
1) I am not licensed to give investment advice. Everything expressed here is an opinion of my own for discussion purposes.
2) The only thing I know about the upcoming merger is that typically they are good for investors. A premium is typically offered when companies go private from what I understand. I certainly was and still am an investor before this announcement was made.
3) Finally, regarding the current OS, while there is lots of conjecture, I must rely on the only available information out there which has been presented in PRs. Therefore, OS as of the last PR was 242m. Consequently, I don't believe there is reason to believe I am a majority holder, despite recent purchases, without making a large degree of assumptions.
If anyone is wondering why I am posting this, it is because I want to make sure no one misinterprets my posts or considers I have any intent on the board other than to share potential ideas/speculate on possibilities.
I invested in Calissio Resources Group because I considered the financial statements warranted an investment. For every reader here that has been paying attention to my posts, please note the following:
1) I am not licensed to give investment advice. Everything expressed here is an opinion of my own for discussion purposes.
2) The only thing I know about the upcoming merger is that typically they are good for investors. A premium is typically offered when companies go private from what I understand. I certainly was and still am an investor before this announcement was made.
3) Finally, regarding the current OS, while there is lots of conjecture, I must rely on the only available information out there which has been presented in PRs. Therefore, OS as of the last PR was 242m. Consequently, I don't believe there is reason to believe I am a majority holder, despite recent purchases, without making a large degree of assumptions.
If anyone is wondering why I am posting this, it is because I want to make sure no one misinterprets my posts or considers I have any intent on the board other than to share potential ideas/speculate on possibilities.