Did Huffman laughed when a Bar complaint was filed
Post# of 7795
Posted On: 10/03/2015 10:16:25 AM
Re: To the Moon #1664
Did Huffman laughed when a Bar complaint was filed "agin" him for lying to the Court? Gotta love the written word.......
Email from Craig to the Defendant last November acknowledging he received the Interrogatories.....
Darrell,
I take it by your service of interrogatories and request for production that you are now waiving the 60 day period of abeyance that the Court graciously allowed you in order to find counsel to represent you. Such was not part of the announced Court Order, and your doing so is not in conformity with her Order as announced and agreed to by all parties at the last hearing. As the Court had ordered the abeyance, we are at a loss as to why you sent these matters. If you were wishing to proceed with the case pro se (representing yourself) then you should not be filing for continuances as you did and asking for the time to gain counsel, which was granted.
As such, we will be submitting the Court Order that you do not agree with the version sent to you. I am attaching the motion for punitive damages again, which we will be pursuing in the case with a hearing for such filing. We will not be supplying you with exhibit A at this time, nor responding to your discovery requests given the interim of the 60 day period which was ordered as an abeyance of action.
Craig A. Huffman, Esquire
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
E-mail: Craig@securuslawgroup.com
Here's what Huffman told the Court in June, which was they didn't get the Interrogatories until June.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/283527320/BS-Notic...-from-SFRX
This is what the Defendant filed with the Court in January, which was GRANTED.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/283527462/Motion-to-Compel-SFRX
The docket clearly shows the Motion was GRANTED in January.
01/08/2015 ORDER ON
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERRGOTORIES AND RESPONSES TO REQUESTS TO PRODUCE.................. GRANTED ........01/06/15 MJC
I think the Judge clearly did the right thing by stepping down. Craig and Kyle played Him for a fool and totally disrespected Him. Maybe the new Judge will sanction Kyle and Craig extremely hard for this KOWARDLY conduct.
Real men don't lie, and when confronted with what might be a mistake, they MAN UP and take responsibility.
Plus you have ClearTrust which failed to respond to the Subpoena Duces Tecum as required.
Email from Craig to the Defendant last November acknowledging he received the Interrogatories.....
Darrell,
I take it by your service of interrogatories and request for production that you are now waiving the 60 day period of abeyance that the Court graciously allowed you in order to find counsel to represent you. Such was not part of the announced Court Order, and your doing so is not in conformity with her Order as announced and agreed to by all parties at the last hearing. As the Court had ordered the abeyance, we are at a loss as to why you sent these matters. If you were wishing to proceed with the case pro se (representing yourself) then you should not be filing for continuances as you did and asking for the time to gain counsel, which was granted.
As such, we will be submitting the Court Order that you do not agree with the version sent to you. I am attaching the motion for punitive damages again, which we will be pursuing in the case with a hearing for such filing. We will not be supplying you with exhibit A at this time, nor responding to your discovery requests given the interim of the 60 day period which was ordered as an abeyance of action.
Craig A. Huffman, Esquire
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
E-mail: Craig@securuslawgroup.com
Here's what Huffman told the Court in June, which was they didn't get the Interrogatories until June.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/283527320/BS-Notic...-from-SFRX
This is what the Defendant filed with the Court in January, which was GRANTED.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/283527462/Motion-to-Compel-SFRX
The docket clearly shows the Motion was GRANTED in January.
01/08/2015 ORDER ON
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERRGOTORIES AND RESPONSES TO REQUESTS TO PRODUCE.................. GRANTED ........01/06/15 MJC
I think the Judge clearly did the right thing by stepping down. Craig and Kyle played Him for a fool and totally disrespected Him. Maybe the new Judge will sanction Kyle and Craig extremely hard for this KOWARDLY conduct.
Real men don't lie, and when confronted with what might be a mistake, they MAN UP and take responsibility.
Plus you have ClearTrust which failed to respond to the Subpoena Duces Tecum as required.
(0)
(0)Seafarer Exploration (SFRX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼