Mach, did you look at the review and the rest of t
Post# of 9144
Posted On: 09/25/2015 10:26:52 PM
Re: Machiavelli20 #1932
Mach, did you look at the review and the rest of the info on Amazon and elsewhere?
My line of reasoning for the post:
1. The dishes don't look like Nanologix. Compare the picture on our home page … each dish is labeled as Nanologix and has TSA and the full name on it. It would be difficult to remove that inside a sealed container.
2. The dishes pictured in the review just say TSA. The label in the center has Evivva Sciences on it and their own lot number. Another place they state, "NO CRACKED OR DRIED AGAR. We pour a thick agar layer into Each and every plate, which makes it unlikely to crack or dry out. Plates are vacuum-sealed and completely sterile." Sounds like they are making their own...
3. Nanologix site currently says one year shelf life. I am not sure we would want some one else claiming a two year shelf life like this: "PREMIUM QUALITY. THICK AGAR, VACUUM SEALED & STERILE, TWO YEAR SHELF LIFE, MAXIMUM BACTERIA GROWTH. NOTHING COMPARES!" Furthermore, Nanologix states, "We sell exclusively to established medical and scientific entities including laboratories, medical institutions, universities, businesses, and research establishments. We will not sell to non-qualified individuals." With that as the target market, why release them as a toy?
4. Evviva doesn't mention that they are a patented process, but does give other credit: "Our science kit was created by PhD scientists from Stanford and UCSF and is the highest quality agar set available."
5. I don't have an inside track to Nanologix so only know what I read on the internet. If you or Number1 heard about this from management, great. But Number1 only says he stumbled across it on the internet. The above points led me to believe that Evviva got a "cease and desist" letter from Nanologix and that is why they are no longer available.
I am not on an acid trip or even an agar trip, and consistently tow the party line for Nanologix. I bought another 200,000 shares so far this year and am depending on Nanologix to succeed. I am not an insider, but I think I have earned the right to comment without being called out for "snide and malicious conclusions". What chance do we have for communication if someone who has been long since 1996 can't inject humor in a post? I agree that there are those who find fault with everything management does, but please don't lump me in with those folks. If you look at my prior posts I think you would agree that I am in sync with your views.
I was not downplaying Number1's post; I was saying he hasn't missed the boat because he can still offer a kit with membranes that students can complete within the confines of a single class period. Go for it if Nanologix will allow the product to be used in that way!
My line of reasoning for the post:
1. The dishes don't look like Nanologix. Compare the picture on our home page … each dish is labeled as Nanologix and has TSA and the full name on it. It would be difficult to remove that inside a sealed container.
2. The dishes pictured in the review just say TSA. The label in the center has Evivva Sciences on it and their own lot number. Another place they state, "NO CRACKED OR DRIED AGAR. We pour a thick agar layer into Each and every plate, which makes it unlikely to crack or dry out. Plates are vacuum-sealed and completely sterile." Sounds like they are making their own...
3. Nanologix site currently says one year shelf life. I am not sure we would want some one else claiming a two year shelf life like this: "PREMIUM QUALITY. THICK AGAR, VACUUM SEALED & STERILE, TWO YEAR SHELF LIFE, MAXIMUM BACTERIA GROWTH. NOTHING COMPARES!" Furthermore, Nanologix states, "We sell exclusively to established medical and scientific entities including laboratories, medical institutions, universities, businesses, and research establishments. We will not sell to non-qualified individuals." With that as the target market, why release them as a toy?
4. Evviva doesn't mention that they are a patented process, but does give other credit: "Our science kit was created by PhD scientists from Stanford and UCSF and is the highest quality agar set available."
5. I don't have an inside track to Nanologix so only know what I read on the internet. If you or Number1 heard about this from management, great. But Number1 only says he stumbled across it on the internet. The above points led me to believe that Evviva got a "cease and desist" letter from Nanologix and that is why they are no longer available.
I am not on an acid trip or even an agar trip, and consistently tow the party line for Nanologix. I bought another 200,000 shares so far this year and am depending on Nanologix to succeed. I am not an insider, but I think I have earned the right to comment without being called out for "snide and malicious conclusions". What chance do we have for communication if someone who has been long since 1996 can't inject humor in a post? I agree that there are those who find fault with everything management does, but please don't lump me in with those folks. If you look at my prior posts I think you would agree that I am in sync with your views.
I was not downplaying Number1's post; I was saying he hasn't missed the boat because he can still offer a kit with membranes that students can complete within the confines of a single class period. Go for it if Nanologix will allow the product to be used in that way!
(0)
(0)