I agree. Snakeclaw's reply to my post sums up what

I agree. Snakeclaw's reply to my post sums up what I fully meant by positive speculation. I like to refer to it as "fact based speculation", which is my best guess at future developments based on my analysis of everything I've seen for actual filings or official statements made by company officials or those directly affiliated with them such as distributors or marketing pros. Sometimes, like snakeclaw stated, answering bashers with facts that contradict them is enjoyable as well as helpful to any that may not have seen those facts. I try to remember them so that I can quickly get to archived articles that prove them wrong. Sometimes their questions are ridiculous because they are paranoid-delusional or acts of intentional fear spreading by those who know that only company officials can provide the answer. Company reps are not always instant with they're replies which gives bashers time to spread panic. It may fall short of panic, but can easily work to deter buying activity by many until the ridiculous "negative speculation" is finally put down with an official reply. Yes, I agree it's only fair to be clear as to whether or not you know something great is scheduled to be released or executed if your wording suggests the possibility.