like the write up and thoughts that went into it.
Post# of 11040
Posted On: 09/21/2015 12:45:37 AM
like the write up and thoughts that went into it.
I would like for the 129m to be true brokers almost never have good numbers on hand and the TA is the best source. If a broker said a number other that was was on OTC, I would give it more weight but the 129 is what the last Q had and think because someone asked the broker for it it, the broker responded with what they last knew and said current as of the day being asked. Would like to be wrong and could be but that is at least how I interpret that.
it is tricky to figure out and some assumptions almost need to be made to support a theory on the SS. I have tried a few different ways to come up with an OS and none of them are perfect. I have found that going back to the numbers in the Q are the best starting point for me. Why? because the legal by COR indicates their clients were converting debt before august 13,which makes the 254 OS point in time not a good starting point as there might be some double counting imo
Starting with the SS from the last Q
129m
+477m from the COR legal
599m
this is pretty close to the 593. That said, the 77 retirement and the other 77m or so not returned start to make numbers hard to figure out.
If the previous 77 retirement was in the numbers given to me then the OS was did get to 676m somehow and than the 77m retirement applied bringing it back down.
Wish someone would ask their broker to make a request to TA and put a lot of this guessing/hypotheticals to bed.
I would like for the 129m to be true brokers almost never have good numbers on hand and the TA is the best source. If a broker said a number other that was was on OTC, I would give it more weight but the 129 is what the last Q had and think because someone asked the broker for it it, the broker responded with what they last knew and said current as of the day being asked. Would like to be wrong and could be but that is at least how I interpret that.
it is tricky to figure out and some assumptions almost need to be made to support a theory on the SS. I have tried a few different ways to come up with an OS and none of them are perfect. I have found that going back to the numbers in the Q are the best starting point for me. Why? because the legal by COR indicates their clients were converting debt before august 13,which makes the 254 OS point in time not a good starting point as there might be some double counting imo
Starting with the SS from the last Q
129m
+477m from the COR legal
599m
this is pretty close to the 593. That said, the 77 retirement and the other 77m or so not returned start to make numbers hard to figure out.
If the previous 77 retirement was in the numbers given to me then the OS was did get to 676m somehow and than the 77m retirement applied bringing it back down.
Wish someone would ask their broker to make a request to TA and put a lot of this guessing/hypotheticals to bed.
(0)
(0)