That is an interesting statement in bold below. If
Post# of 72440
Posted On: 09/19/2015 3:31:36 PM
That is an interesting statement in bold below. If Seeking Alpha editors are making and publishing (or allowing to be published on their website), their judgements on individual companies such as the statement in bold below, then they should not be able to claim that they are simply providing publication opportunities for anonymous authors. In the case below, they obviously provided their input into the article and allowed that opinion to be published in the article.
KarinCA has said that SA editors required her to make changes to an article she wrote prior to agreeing to publish said article. So that makes two examples of SA editors making judgements about individual stocks and/or article content published on SA. That alone should be enough to make SA liable for damages in this case.
But that is not the only legitimate argument for damages IMO. There is also the fact that SA has apparently (per KarinCA) pulled down negative articles in the past. If so, what is the difference between those cases and this negative article on CTIX?
Perhaps the correct Class Action Lawsuit should be against SA with every company they have "smeared" as the members of the class?
http://seekingalpha.com/article/3296225-galec...re-is-fire
KarinCA has said that SA editors required her to make changes to an article she wrote prior to agreeing to publish said article. So that makes two examples of SA editors making judgements about individual stocks and/or article content published on SA. That alone should be enough to make SA liable for damages in this case.
But that is not the only legitimate argument for damages IMO. There is also the fact that SA has apparently (per KarinCA) pulled down negative articles in the past. If so, what is the difference between those cases and this negative article on CTIX?
Perhaps the correct Class Action Lawsuit should be against SA with every company they have "smeared" as the members of the class?
Quote:
The editors of Seeking Alpha have informed me that G**T stock is showing evidence of price promotion. Stock promotion is very worrying for potential investors, because it means the Company is paying to market its shares to the public. These marketing maneuvers are initiated by large shareholders who want to reduce their exposure to the Company. If large shareholders are paying to reduce their positions, then a small investor probably should stay away.
- From an article on Seeking Alpha by Calder H. Lamb on July 1, 2015.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/3296225-galec...re-is-fire
(0)
(0)Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (IPIX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼