That is just absolute BS. If "users" do "not attri

That is just absolute BS. If "users" do "not attribute the same level of credence" to SA then why has the Rosen Law Firm issued a PR saying that the article "revealed" improprieties? (Rosen is not the only law firm citing that article.) And why has the Rosen Firm filed a lawsuit citing the article? That judge's statement in the NNVC case is absurd! LAWYERS are part of THAT judge's profession, and they obviously give SERIOUS "credence" to anonymous authors on SA!

Sometimes our legal system really ticks me off...

Info from slcimmuno:

Quote:

---

NNVC took SA to court to try to learn the identity of their anonymous attacker. The judge in the NNVC case, though sympathetic to the plaintiff, ruled that Pump Terminator’s anonymous quips on Seeking Alpha could not be deemed defamatory. She reasoned that Seeking Alpha is:

“a repository of a wide range of casual emotive and imprecise speech, and that users not attribute the same level of credence to the statements they would accord to statements made in another context.”

In other words: Don’t believe everything they read on Internet review websites.

---