rbtree Monday, 09/14/15 02:34:57 PM Re: Neophiu
Post# of 11040
Posted On: 09/14/2015 3:23:10 PM
rbtree Monday, 09/14/15 02:34:57 PM
Re: Neophius post# 35098
Post #
35102
of 35112 Go
Nope. Those daily numbers are meaningless. Only the first leg of a trade is reported(which is true the short position was taken at that amount, but the bi weekly only shows settled short interest, those that were taken out and covered a day or more after the short interest position was taken.), and that figure represents the ones where a MM went short to handle the trade. In almost all cases (if they are not made right away they have 16 to 24 days to find the shares), a long entry was made right away to close the trade.
deceptive, last time I will comment on naked short selling here. all explanations are in (, and, ).
Those that are interested look at my conversation with Janice she agrees with the fact that only settled short interest is reported on the bi-weekly and they have 16 to 24 days to cover, here:
Re: Neophius post# 35098
Post #
35102
of 35112 Go
Nope. Those daily numbers are meaningless. Only the first leg of a trade is reported(which is true the short position was taken at that amount, but the bi weekly only shows settled short interest, those that were taken out and covered a day or more after the short interest position was taken.), and that figure represents the ones where a MM went short to handle the trade. In almost all cases (if they are not made right away they have 16 to 24 days to find the shares), a long entry was made right away to close the trade.
deceptive, last time I will comment on naked short selling here. all explanations are in (, and, ).
Those that are interested look at my conversation with Janice she agrees with the fact that only settled short interest is reported on the bi-weekly and they have 16 to 24 days to cover, here:
(0)
(0)