"Suggested Ignore List" is needed. How about havin
Post# of 9144
Posted On: 08/17/2015 11:29:40 AM
"Suggested Ignore List" is needed. How about having someone who can keep the names straight create a sticky note that lists names that can be strategically ignored.
We keep talking about ignoring, but one or another rises to the bait and gives credence to those who do not have the best interests of NNLX in mind. This is not a news site which has to give both sides of the story, so why do we let a few hecklers take over the news cycle. If we all worked from the same ignore list, life would be better.
I am long on NNLX and have added shares this year even as uncertainty exists. My presumptions are as follows:
1. BB is never going to relish the role of CEO of a PUBLIC company, but that is what he is stuck with.
2. When financials are posted, it is not the turning over of a new leaf that signals a start to current reporting; instead, it is something that had to be done because a company that BB was dealing with required the information to proceed. After that need was met, no further financial information will be released.
3. BB is working in my best interests because he is invested as well, but works on his terms.
4. A buyout is the logical best conclusion to this story, but probably won't happen because of BB's desire to be successful on his own.
My wife and I watch "Shark Tank" and keep hearing Mark Cuban tell prospects, "You have a product, not a business." NNLX has products, but growing a business that supports a high valuation is still elusive because the market place is not an even playing field where innovation is welcomed.
We keep talking about ignoring, but one or another rises to the bait and gives credence to those who do not have the best interests of NNLX in mind. This is not a news site which has to give both sides of the story, so why do we let a few hecklers take over the news cycle. If we all worked from the same ignore list, life would be better.
I am long on NNLX and have added shares this year even as uncertainty exists. My presumptions are as follows:
1. BB is never going to relish the role of CEO of a PUBLIC company, but that is what he is stuck with.
2. When financials are posted, it is not the turning over of a new leaf that signals a start to current reporting; instead, it is something that had to be done because a company that BB was dealing with required the information to proceed. After that need was met, no further financial information will be released.
3. BB is working in my best interests because he is invested as well, but works on his terms.
4. A buyout is the logical best conclusion to this story, but probably won't happen because of BB's desire to be successful on his own.
My wife and I watch "Shark Tank" and keep hearing Mark Cuban tell prospects, "You have a product, not a business." NNLX has products, but growing a business that supports a high valuation is still elusive because the market place is not an even playing field where innovation is welcomed.
(0)
(0)