that surprise you? they need sellers. they need sh
Post# of 96891
Posted On: 08/12/2015 4:22:26 PM
Re: 2015invest #27036
that surprise you? they need sellers. they need shareholders to get emotional. scared. dump and get out (so they can cover their positions)
two months ago (or whatever). weren't they saying "ntek was being evicted"? (oldest trick in the book)
why?
didn't they post pictures? use outdated listings? post a fake realty pic as well?
haven't they pulled that crap before? "wells notice" for ex. for years (all bullcrap). fbi. cia. sec (list any letters u like )
didn't they suggest "peter riordan was gone (for months). ntek has no ceo"? et. al
anything to create fear. that's their game
with all the "dilution" how is it ntek climbed up from $0072 to $013 recently (with " record dilution"?)
just b/z shares come into the float (matured) doesn't mean they are automatically being sold. of course many inexperienced investors are being made to think so (but why?)
(and i'm not saying they are or aren't. but if it was all "sky is falling", why'd the price go up? shouldn't it have gone down?)
even last week. ntek only issued 5mill to o/s. the rate of new issuance has dropped. dramatically. last year's "new issuances" (from filings ) matured. but it isn't clear they "were dumped". if they were. great. question is. why has the price moved higher over this "record period"? when the float has gone up considerably?
could be those shares are being used for deals. acquisitions. funding. bills. whatever. but if they are being "dumped". how/why has the price gone up?
someone pm'd me. that they call ihang "the outer web". really? ha ha. i'm told we kick ihub's ass. beating ihub by 2-5 times (as many reads ) each day (for over two months) . don't think they're not monitoring this very board (why? why if no financial stake? simple question. easy answer )
weren't recently caught saying "paramount is pulling "interstellar" (for nonpayment)". before that, they were saying "that "interstellar" contract is expiring (they anticipated. speculated. maybe even hoped. they were wrong)
btw, i researched the paramount claim. best i can tell, paramount (and any studio with a hit like this) takes their money up front. they don't risk or take losses. you want the film. you pay up (otherwise, pound salt. aka no film for you)
these guys are fos. the sooner people realize and stay the hell away from ihub (or learn to do their own research), the better
everyone does what works for them. but don't be surprised by their lies. they've been lying as long as i've been breathing (low to mid-level hedgies. bankers. finance guys. money managers,...biggest lying pos's i've ever encountered in my life)
didn't like,.... 30 ihub posters (all the same cast of characters) claim "ultraflix can't be found in retail"? ( repeated daily. )
it led shareholders to create map sightings. many with pics and vids
https://www.zeemaps.com/map?group=1567585
wasn't the shareholder meeting not supposed to happen this year? then supposed to be cancelled? (after it was announced ). characterizes as "just a sham come on" (heard that. for the third time. each year they say the same crap. they need some new material)
weren't they pounding the table about a cnet review? now cnet blows right? same with the avsforum. anyone post that there. sure that forum is just a bunch of ntek sympathizers right? (too funny. so obvious these guys are invested )
recap
ntek hasn't been paying their rent
ntek being evicted
wells notice
fbi
"interstellar" is getting pulled. licensing period ended (months ago)
money is owed on "interstellar". expect lawsuit (months ago)
shareholder meeting will be cancelled (of course that was before "it wasn't going to take place", to begin with )
ultraflix is not at retail
ntek has no ceo (for months now)
cnet blows
avsforum too
we could add more. like no ntgl shares. no patents. all the other bullcrap that comes out of their asses on the regular (as has for the past few years. ever since nitwit was saying ntek would never break up through $003 - always calling a top. lol )
simple question. why? with no financial position. are these 40-75 aliases found posting 24/7 on lie-hub? (they have an interest. a financial one. very simple )
two months ago (or whatever). weren't they saying "ntek was being evicted"? (oldest trick in the book)
why?
didn't they post pictures? use outdated listings? post a fake realty pic as well?
haven't they pulled that crap before? "wells notice" for ex. for years (all bullcrap). fbi. cia. sec (list any letters u like )
didn't they suggest "peter riordan was gone (for months). ntek has no ceo"? et. al
anything to create fear. that's their game
with all the "dilution" how is it ntek climbed up from $0072 to $013 recently (with " record dilution"?)
just b/z shares come into the float (matured) doesn't mean they are automatically being sold. of course many inexperienced investors are being made to think so (but why?)
(and i'm not saying they are or aren't. but if it was all "sky is falling", why'd the price go up? shouldn't it have gone down?)
even last week. ntek only issued 5mill to o/s. the rate of new issuance has dropped. dramatically. last year's "new issuances" (from filings ) matured. but it isn't clear they "were dumped". if they were. great. question is. why has the price moved higher over this "record period"? when the float has gone up considerably?
could be those shares are being used for deals. acquisitions. funding. bills. whatever. but if they are being "dumped". how/why has the price gone up?
someone pm'd me. that they call ihang "the outer web". really? ha ha. i'm told we kick ihub's ass. beating ihub by 2-5 times (as many reads ) each day (for over two months) . don't think they're not monitoring this very board (why? why if no financial stake? simple question. easy answer )
weren't recently caught saying "paramount is pulling "interstellar" (for nonpayment)". before that, they were saying "that "interstellar" contract is expiring (they anticipated. speculated. maybe even hoped. they were wrong)
btw, i researched the paramount claim. best i can tell, paramount (and any studio with a hit like this) takes their money up front. they don't risk or take losses. you want the film. you pay up (otherwise, pound salt. aka no film for you)
these guys are fos. the sooner people realize and stay the hell away from ihub (or learn to do their own research), the better
everyone does what works for them. but don't be surprised by their lies. they've been lying as long as i've been breathing (low to mid-level hedgies. bankers. finance guys. money managers,...biggest lying pos's i've ever encountered in my life)
didn't like,.... 30 ihub posters (all the same cast of characters) claim "ultraflix can't be found in retail"? ( repeated daily. )
it led shareholders to create map sightings. many with pics and vids
https://www.zeemaps.com/map?group=1567585
wasn't the shareholder meeting not supposed to happen this year? then supposed to be cancelled? (after it was announced ). characterizes as "just a sham come on" (heard that. for the third time. each year they say the same crap. they need some new material)
weren't they pounding the table about a cnet review? now cnet blows right? same with the avsforum. anyone post that there. sure that forum is just a bunch of ntek sympathizers right? (too funny. so obvious these guys are invested )
recap
ntek hasn't been paying their rent
ntek being evicted
wells notice
fbi
"interstellar" is getting pulled. licensing period ended (months ago)
money is owed on "interstellar". expect lawsuit (months ago)
shareholder meeting will be cancelled (of course that was before "it wasn't going to take place", to begin with )
ultraflix is not at retail
ntek has no ceo (for months now)
cnet blows
avsforum too
we could add more. like no ntgl shares. no patents. all the other bullcrap that comes out of their asses on the regular (as has for the past few years. ever since nitwit was saying ntek would never break up through $003 - always calling a top. lol )
simple question. why? with no financial position. are these 40-75 aliases found posting 24/7 on lie-hub? (they have an interest. a financial one. very simple )
(0)
(0)