It is my contention that NANOCO has yet to deliver
Post# of 22441
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/16/idU...5J20150716
The following article is current and demonstrates the impetus behind the sudden drop from Nanoco
http://www.euractiv.com/sections/science-poli...ban-314831
Regards
Sunny:>
![](/images/icons/icon_wink.gif)
![Like This Post](/images/thumb-up.png)
![Dislike This Post](/images/thumb-down.png)