So it's fair to conclude that Riordan in person (i
Post# of 2009
Posted On: 07/30/2015 3:54:19 AM
So it's fair to conclude that Riordan in person (if it was him) has told lies in the faces of the investors, again. No 100 titles added 30 days after the June 29th announcement, as we already anticipated.
Thanks for that. This once more confirms the bad track history of NTEK statements.
On the other hand, the Alexa numbers are getting interesting.
I believe they are reflecting that statement about the promised 100 movies that never made it in time.
In July, they show a major rise in US rank in the last days of the second week with a 14% rise in a few days, with a highest listing around the 18-19th, about 3 weeks after the announcement "between 15-30 days".
Then the ranking goes down again, with a lowest last weekend, and climbing again to a new high yesterday, a little higher than the July 19th ranking.
So I wouldn't be surprised that it's mainly NTEK investors that were the cause of this rise, not users of Ultraflix that had no knowledge of that promise.
I guess there are a lot more disappointed people out there now.
Thanks for that. This once more confirms the bad track history of NTEK statements.
On the other hand, the Alexa numbers are getting interesting.
I believe they are reflecting that statement about the promised 100 movies that never made it in time.
In July, they show a major rise in US rank in the last days of the second week with a 14% rise in a few days, with a highest listing around the 18-19th, about 3 weeks after the announcement "between 15-30 days".
Then the ranking goes down again, with a lowest last weekend, and climbing again to a new high yesterday, a little higher than the July 19th ranking.
So I wouldn't be surprised that it's mainly NTEK investors that were the cause of this rise, not users of Ultraflix that had no knowledge of that promise.
I guess there are a lot more disappointed people out there now.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼