I agree there are issues which need to be addresse
Post# of 75002
Also, not once did Jason bring up Jerry. It is my opinion that Jerry voluntarily is letting the others run with this company while he rides along and does his part. Sure, he seems to run the FB page (which needs to change to someone more in tune with social media in a business format), but Jerry wants recognition, no doubt, but I really see him knowing to step back and let the experienced people do their thing. Good for him for that.
Jerry owns 51+% of the stock so of course he has a say so, but I have not seen anything in the months I was dealing with them that indicated he is steering the ship. Not once, and I mean not once, did either Tom or Jason mention anything about checking with Jerry or anything remotely like that. Both of those guys had full decision making authority.
I have not dealt with Harry so no comment there.
None of this is a slam against Jerry. He has said he's working a lot on this business and I don't want it to come off like he's shoved aside, just that he's building a good team and letting his team mates do what they do best. Delegation is working. I'd hate to see a founder who is also a micromanager. We don't seem to have that problem here.
Car sponsorship:
The car "sponsorship" experiment was a mistake. Not lethal, just a speed bump, but they need to learn from it, exit it, and move on. I don't know if that was a Rhino move, but I'm thinking it wasn't. It's too soon for vanity advertising like that. But let's not go into drama queen mode over it.
Another problem is that penny stock investors are often more skittish than blue chip investors. If this doesn't apply to you then disregard this. But you won't read 90% of the complaints on these penny stock boards on the blue chip boards. There are many reasons for that....established companies with years of learning from their mistakes, etc. I don't think it helps to be checking these boards on a daily basis either. It seems to work some people up. Again, if this doesn't apply to you, that's fine. It's for the people who it does.
PRs:
PRs are a delicate ballance between over reporting minor events vs. under reporting major issues. Report something with too few details and you are accused of pumping the stock. Not reporting bigger events and you're accused of not communicating enough with your shareholders. There will always be people who whine about little and big issues.
If something doesn't get reported, don't have a meltdown and think the world is out to get you. Long investors aren't going to see major profits for another 6-24 months anyway, depending on your exit point for this stock.
Just keep in mind this is the beginning of the second quarter of this product. I will admit the stock isn't rising up to reflect the success it's had and I don't think it will until they uplist. It will bounce around in the teens like it has.
Constructive dialogue is always welcome!