Dude, what you don't seem to know is that more tha
Post# of 2009
Posted On: 07/15/2015 3:43:41 PM
Re: Stock_Hunter #921
Dude, what you don't seem to know is that more than 40%, and most of the latest additions, are all Silver, which is plain and simple upscaled HD. Since a 4K TV can do 4K upscaling instantly and automatically, I can't imagine that it takes weeks or even months between the announcement of "Nanotech adds blablabla to its Ultarflix library" and the actual appearence.
Most of the 4K native content was uploaded last year already, and there are only a hand full of "Gold" movies that require most attention.
Heck even Interstellar was upscaled.
By the way, most A-list films are shot in 4K now (even Moonshiners). Interstellar could have been in 4K, as it was shot in Imax format. Yet it was upscaled on UF.
Why do we see Inception Media Group B-films appear now, announced at the end of April, and none from f.e. Millennium or IFC that were confirmed by the CEO to be on Ultraflix at the end of March ?
Ah yes, of course, the signatures !! Still missing presumably. I wonder why.
Why hasn't any of the Bollywood films mentioned in the NTEK PR showed up yet ?
It all smells cheap, no money to buy A-list.
"We want to, but we can't afford to"
That's ok by me, but they should be honest about it to investors, and they are not.
But you don't seem to worry about these discrepencies of what is announced, and what is accomplished. Thats clear.
It's cool alright that the UF logo appears on the displays and is shown in the loops playing, but that doesn't mean buyers will be renting movies from UF. At least not those with a Sony for now ...
And finally, I don't really think that Sony and Samsung are promoting Ultraflix. I believe they are just promoting their TV's, with some fancy logo's to show that there is 4K content, for those that really want to pay for that. And Ultraflix is trying to take advantage of that, kind a win-win.
I hope it works out.
Really do. But it doesn't look good right now.
Most of the 4K native content was uploaded last year already, and there are only a hand full of "Gold" movies that require most attention.
Heck even Interstellar was upscaled.
By the way, most A-list films are shot in 4K now (even Moonshiners). Interstellar could have been in 4K, as it was shot in Imax format. Yet it was upscaled on UF.
Why do we see Inception Media Group B-films appear now, announced at the end of April, and none from f.e. Millennium or IFC that were confirmed by the CEO to be on Ultraflix at the end of March ?
Ah yes, of course, the signatures !! Still missing presumably. I wonder why.
Why hasn't any of the Bollywood films mentioned in the NTEK PR showed up yet ?
Quote:Strange that in stead we get flicks that aren't even in the top 100 Bollywood list.
UltraFlix adds the Top 50 Grossing Indian Films to its new Bollywood 4K Ultra HD Channel
The Bollywood hits being added to the UltraFlix network's growing library of 4K content include:
Romance: Jab Tak Hai Jaan, One By Two, Fanaa
Drama: ISHAQZAADE, Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham, Mohabbatein
Action Thriller: EK Tha Tiger, Agneepath, Gunday
Horror: DARR @ The Mall, Dhoom:3, Kahaani
Comedy: OMG Oh My God, Hum Tum, Andaz Apna Apna
It all smells cheap, no money to buy A-list.
"We want to, but we can't afford to"
That's ok by me, but they should be honest about it to investors, and they are not.
But you don't seem to worry about these discrepencies of what is announced, and what is accomplished. Thats clear.
It's cool alright that the UF logo appears on the displays and is shown in the loops playing, but that doesn't mean buyers will be renting movies from UF. At least not those with a Sony for now ...
And finally, I don't really think that Sony and Samsung are promoting Ultraflix. I believe they are just promoting their TV's, with some fancy logo's to show that there is 4K content, for those that really want to pay for that. And Ultraflix is trying to take advantage of that, kind a win-win.
I hope it works out.
Really do. But it doesn't look good right now.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼