LFirst, an apology to the board - the table was mu
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 07/12/2015 10:15:44 AM
Re: ThePennyShill #20721
LFirst, an apology to the board - the table was much more readable before I tried to publish it here - I clearly have some work to do there.
I have no interest in counting the posts of those who allegedly are shareholders in PTOI - I would expect them to be posting here. The anomalies (currently you three) however, are of interest to me. Those include posters who are not, and likely have never been, shareholders, along with those who claim they once were, but decided to sell their shares for reasons that made sense to them. In my view, there is no comparison to be made, fair or otherwise; the purpose of the table was to show how the posting activity of the anomalies have ramped up significantly (for two of you) in the month of July. I only assign this statistic (and this venue) passing interest, because this is one SMB of many, and what gets posted here has limited bearing on matters of consequence. You are free to compile your own table, as hammchuck has, to illustrate what interests you. Your charts, IMO, and your postings, do that already.
I continue to be intrigued by what could possibly motivate the anomalies to come here daily and regurgitate the things they do.....those motivations highlight a significant psychological disconnect from rational behavior that is worth discussing.
Why would anyone continue to anonymously post material meant to disparage and demean others, in regards to their investment decisions, long after the investment's performance has withered?
Any thoughts on that?
Quote:
Please post yours and 4kids posting stats as well, so that we can make a fair comparison.
I have no interest in counting the posts of those who allegedly are shareholders in PTOI - I would expect them to be posting here. The anomalies (currently you three) however, are of interest to me. Those include posters who are not, and likely have never been, shareholders, along with those who claim they once were, but decided to sell their shares for reasons that made sense to them. In my view, there is no comparison to be made, fair or otherwise; the purpose of the table was to show how the posting activity of the anomalies have ramped up significantly (for two of you) in the month of July. I only assign this statistic (and this venue) passing interest, because this is one SMB of many, and what gets posted here has limited bearing on matters of consequence. You are free to compile your own table, as hammchuck has, to illustrate what interests you. Your charts, IMO, and your postings, do that already.
I continue to be intrigued by what could possibly motivate the anomalies to come here daily and regurgitate the things they do.....those motivations highlight a significant psychological disconnect from rational behavior that is worth discussing.
Why would anyone continue to anonymously post material meant to disparage and demean others, in regards to their investment decisions, long after the investment's performance has withered?
Any thoughts on that?
(0)
(0)