4kids - Will you please define, with examples, the

Quote:

---

Posted On: 06/23/2015 12:23:27 PM

Posted By: 4kids
Re: Renz #20429
because every time a colluding entity wash traded PTOI in the last 6 to 9 months
.. part of their *wash traded* pool >> got picked off by P2O investors

i'll take low to no volume from now till mgmt files

but i suspect we see *volume* within a week's time frame
and it will be interesting to see if it's another *round* of imo that 1M cert
accessed EO 2014 (Seneca's) .. 150k to 200k .. *utilized*

edit >> and if another *block* is utilized >> it will telling to see *if marked* .. or not

(reminder 5.26.15 tape and then 6.8.15 and 6.12.15)

colluding entities have a real problem .. with avgs .. (90 day in particular)

btw .. imo based on interacting with many P2O investors .. most (not all) have
DCA'd *shares* over the last few years ... and are content to patiently bide
their time .. essentially >> certain P2O investors have turned the table on those
who collude

they continue to provide bid support (or as i call it speed bumps) which have to be filled
in total b4 taking PTOI *lower*

and imo most P2O investors understand the drill that hitting the ask just aids
and abets (easier to reset)

i'm watching the bid creep ever upward as YOY %s are about to go GREEN

not for anything but it was Dec 2013 .. (18 months ago) that that last *round*
kicked in .. and i CANT help but appreciate the irony in play/place

of wasted *efforts* .. (essentially greed coupled with stupidity)

prior *round* was RH's lack of a honeymoon (mid Aug 2013 to early Dec 2013)

i also strongly suspect they (colluders) are dancing ever closer to triggering threshold ..

which imo will SHOW (for the 3rd time on PTOI) within 6 days of mgmt's next material event filed
(re: pilot and/or monies transferred)

i have to be specific since every word is parsed by the CON side of the original crew >> *elsewhere* ..

4kids

---