Your post left out an important bit from the same
Post# of 56323
"Occasionally the Court will embark upon other inquiries. Was the decision-maker biased, or is there at least the appearance of bias? Did he act in bad faith or with malice? Has there been a breach of a person's constitutional rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms? Has an applicant been unfairly singled out for special treatment? Has the decision-maker abused his discretion? Has the decision-maker made his decision prematurely?"
This is the only relevant and pertinent fact regarding this JR.