i have zero doubts the answer i seek re: RH's inte
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 06/24/2015 3:24:20 PM
Re: autumnforest #20450
i have zero doubts the answer i seek re: RH's intent re: P2O
comes to pass in 2015
RH has little to no leverage without sales (sans prox sales .. IP sells *imo* for 2.50 per share)
with sales >> IP sells for 5.00 to 12.00 per share (and colluding entities get
a financially CONtrolled break they have been praying for)
with AGM >> in late summer .. we should know if indy BoD is seated or not
imo there is no *give here* .. it's either/or
i absolutely believe that Eco *tested* (along with OBG) >> P2O in 2013 (after RH was installed)
it takes *time* .. that those of us who did sell *large ticket items* to both educational and enterprises understand .. to get seeded
what is so cool about OBG .. imo is their diversification of clients
i would never want P2O to be in a position where their only client was *federal
i'm not a fan of putting all eggs in one basket
it will be interesting to see what *role* is eventually assigned to OBG
i.e. > P2O's partner for both domestic and international .. or just domestic
again the joy of SMBs .. is we can all speculate
i do believe WM was in P2O's picture circa Dec 2010 .. based on other DD
that said .. clearly *terms* weren't acceptable if *rumor* was true ..
i doubt they will be left out of this next round with P2O .. one way or the other
4kids
comes to pass in 2015
RH has little to no leverage without sales (sans prox sales .. IP sells *imo* for 2.50 per share)
with sales >> IP sells for 5.00 to 12.00 per share (and colluding entities get
a financially CONtrolled break they have been praying for)
with AGM >> in late summer .. we should know if indy BoD is seated or not
imo there is no *give here* .. it's either/or
i absolutely believe that Eco *tested* (along with OBG) >> P2O in 2013 (after RH was installed)
it takes *time* .. that those of us who did sell *large ticket items* to both educational and enterprises understand .. to get seeded
what is so cool about OBG .. imo is their diversification of clients
i would never want P2O to be in a position where their only client was *federal
i'm not a fan of putting all eggs in one basket
it will be interesting to see what *role* is eventually assigned to OBG
i.e. > P2O's partner for both domestic and international .. or just domestic
again the joy of SMBs .. is we can all speculate
i do believe WM was in P2O's picture circa Dec 2010 .. based on other DD
that said .. clearly *terms* weren't acceptable if *rumor* was true ..
i doubt they will be left out of this next round with P2O .. one way or the other
4kids
(0)
(0)